Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest

2002 Positions

Issues: Abortion
State Office District Name Party Rating
WA State House 11 Position 1 Zack Hudgins Democratic 100%
WA State House 29 Position 2 Steve Kirby Democratic 100%
WA State House 32 Position 2 Ruth Kagi Democratic 100%
WA State House 37 Position 1 Sharon Tomiko Santos Democratic 100%
WA State House 37 Position 2 Eric Pettigrew Democratic 100%
WA State House 41 Position 2 Judy Clibborn Democratic 100%
WA State House 43 Position 2 Frank Chopp Democratic 100%
WA State House 44 Position 1 John Lovick Democratic 100%
WA State Senate 22 Sam Hunt Democratic 100%
WA State Senate 27 Jeannie Darneille Democratic 100%
WA State Senate 32 Maralyn Chase Democratic 100%
WA State Senate 33 Karen Keiser Democratic 100%
WA State Senate 38 John McCoy Democratic 100%
WA Mayor At-Large Edward Murray 100%
WA Council Member 5 Hans Dunshee Democratic 100%
WA Council Member 8 Joe McDermott 100%
WA Commissioner 1 Jerome Delvin 17%
WA Commissioner 2 Sandra Romero Democratic 100%
Jean Berkey 100%
Mike Cooper 100%
Jeanne Edwards 100%
William Eickmeyer 86%
Tracey Eide 100%
Darlene Fairley 100%
Dennis Flannigan 100%
Rosa Franklin 100%
Jeffrey Gombosky 100%
Bill Grant 100%
Ross Hunter 100%
Ken Jacobsen 57%
Fred Jarrett 100%
Phyllis Kenney 100%
Adam Kline 100%
Jeanne Kohl-Welles 100%
Patricia Lantz 100%
Kelli Linville 100%
Jim McIntire 100%
Jim Moeller 100%
Dawn Morrell 100%
Erik Poulsen 100%
Aaron Reardon 100%
Phil Rockefeller 100%
Laura Ruderman 100%
Shay Schual-Berke 100%
Paull Shin 100%
Geoff Simpson 100%
Helen Sommers 100%
Patricia Thibaudeau 100%
Rodney Tom 86%
Velma Veloria 100%
Deb Wallace 100%
Alex Wood 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top