Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: North Carolina League of Conservation Voters

2000 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
NC U.S. Senate Jr Kay Hagan Democratic 100%
NC U.S. House 5 Virginia Foxx Republican 83%
NC State House 23 Joe Tolson Democratic 88%
NC State House 26 Namon Daughtry Republican 29%
NC State House 30 Paul Luebke Democratic 100%
NC State House 31 Mickey Michaux, Jr. Democratic 100%
NC State House 56 Verla Insko Democratic 100%
NC State House 58 Alma Adams Democratic 63%
NC State House 79 Julia Howard Republican 25%
NC State House 87 Edgar Starnes Republican 13%
NC State House 89 Mitchell Setzer Republican 57%
NC State House 101 Beverly Earle Democratic 88%
NC State House 120 Roger West Republican 38%
NC State Senate 14 Dan Blue, Jr. Democratic 100%
NC State Senate 36 Fletcher Hartsell, Jr. Republican 67%
NC State Senate 39 Robert Rucho Republican 67%
NC State Senate 42 Austin Allran Republican 83%
NC Commissioner of Insurance Wayne Goodwin Democratic 100%
NC Secretary of Revenue Lyons Gray Republican 100%
Charles Albertson 83%
Martha Alexander 100%
Gordon Philip Allen 88%
Cary Allred 38%
Gene Gray Arnold 63%
Philip Augustine Baddour, Jr. 100%
Rex Baker 38%
Frank Ballance, Jr. 100%
Patrick Ballantine 83%
Bobby Harold Barbee, Sr. 75%
Daniel Barefoot 75%
Marc Basnight 67%
James Black 100%
Donald Allen Bonner 88%
Joanne Bowie 100%
Flossie Boyd-McIntyre 88%
Harold Brubaker 50%
Charles Franklin Buchanan 20%
J. Russell Capps 50%
Robert Carpenter 50%
John Carrington 83%
Charles Carter, Jr. 100%
Walter Church, Sr. 75%
Debbie Clary 63%
Daniel Clodfelter 100%
Nelson Cole 63%
A. Leslie Cox, Jr. 75%
James Crawford, Jr. 63%
Billy James Creech 25%
Arlie Franklin Culp, Jr. 50%
William Thomas Culpepper III 100%
William Pete Cunningham 88%
Walter Dalton 100%
Charlie Dannelly 100%
Donald Spencer Davis 13%
Michael Decker, Sr. 38%
Andrew Thomas Dedmon 88%
Jerry Dockham 71%
Ruth Easterling 75%
Rick Louis Eddins 38%
Zeno Edwards, Jr. 88%
James Samuel Ellis 50%
Theresa Harlow Esposito 71%
Milton Fitch, Jr. 63%
James Forrester 83%
Stanley Harold Fox 57%
Linda Garrou 100%
John Garwood 83%
Pryor Gibson III 88%
Mitch Gillespie 25%
William Grady 38%
Jim Gulley 50%
Wilbur Gulley 83%
Joe Hackney 100%
Robert Phillip Haire 100%
John Hall 100%
Oscar Harris 83%
Robert Jonathan Hensley, Jr. 100%
William Seth Hiatt 33%
Dewey Hill 88%
George Milton Holmes 20%
Hamilton Horton, Jr. 67%
David Hoyle, Sr. 83%
Howard Hunter, Jr. 63%
John Hurley 86%
Mary Jarrell 88%
Margaret Jeffus 88%
Luther Henry Jordan, Jr. 100%
Larry Thomas Justus 43%
John Kerr III 100%
Eleanor Kinnaird 100%
Joe Kiser 25%
Howard Nathaniel Lee 100%
Jeanne Hopkins Lucas 100%
Robert Martin 50%
William Martin 83%
Mary McAllister 88%
Daniel McComas 71%
Willard Eugene McCombs 63%
Marian McLawhorn 100%
William Edwin McMahan 71%
Stephen Metcalf 100%
Paul Miller 100%
Brad Miller 100%
David Morris Miner 71%
William Franklin Mitchell 50%
Kenneth Moore 67%
Richard Morgan 83%
Amelia Morris 38%
Martin Nesbitt, Jr. 88%
Edd Nye 88%
Thomas LaFontine Odom, Sr. 100%
Warren Claude Oldham 100%
William Owens, Jr. 63%
Aaron Plyler 100%
James Pope 75%
Jean Preston 63%
William Purcell 100%
Anthony Rand 83%
John Melvin Rayfield 38%
David Redwine 75%
Eric Miller Reeves 100%
Dan Robinson 100%
Richard Eugene Rogers 88%
Carolyn Barnes Russell 50%
Drew Saunders 100%
Paul Wayne Sexton, Sr. 63%
Larry Shaw 67%
Robert Shaw 67%
Wilma Sherrill 71%
Ronald Smith 38%
Robert Soles, Jr. 100%
Ronnie Sutton 75%
W. B. Teague, Jr. 50%
Gregory James Thompson 75%
Russell Tucker 88%
William Wainwright 100%
Trudi Walend 63%
Edward 'Alexander Warner, Jr. 88%
Edith Warren 88%
Edward Warren 80%
Nurham Osbie Warwick 75%
Hugh Webster 40%
David Weinstein 100%
Jennifer Weiss 100%
Allen Wellons 83%
Constance Wilson 75%
William Eugene Wilson 38%
Larry Womble 100%
Thomas Wright 100%
Douglas Yongue 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top