Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: North Carolina League of Conservation Voters

1999 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
NC U.S. House 5 Virginia Foxx Republican 86%
NC U.S. House 12 Alma Adams Democratic 71%
NC State House 26 Leo Daughtry Republican 86%
NC State House 30 Paul Luebke Democratic 100%
NC State House 31 Mickey Michaux, Jr. Democratic 100%
NC State House 56 Verla Insko Democratic 100%
NC State House 79 Julia Howard Republican 78%
NC State House 89 Mitchell Setzer Republican 56%
NC State House 101 Beverly Earle Democratic 100%
NC State Senate 14 Dan Blue, Jr. Democratic 100%
NC State Senate 36 Fletcher Hartsell, Jr. Republican 86%
NC State Senate 39 Robert Rucho Republican 67%
NC Mayor At-Large Daniel Clodfelter 100%
Charles Albertson 100%
Martha Alexander 100%
Gordon Philip Allen 89%
Austin Allran 86%
Cary Allred 56%
Gene Gray Arnold 67%
Philip Augustine Baddour, Jr. 100%
Rex Baker 11%
Frank Ballance, Jr. 86%
Patrick Ballantine 86%
Bobby Harold Barbee, Sr. 100%
Daniel Barefoot 89%
Marc Basnight 71%
James Black 89%
Donald Allen Bonner 100%
Joanne Bowie 89%
Flossie Boyd-McIntyre 100%
Harold Brubaker 67%
Charles Franklin Buchanan 78%
J. Russell Capps 44%
Margaret Carpenter 33%
Robert Carpenter 100%
John Carrington 86%
Charles Carter, Jr. 100%
Walter Church, Sr. 100%
Debbie Clary 44%
Nelson Cole 67%
A. Leslie Cox, Jr. 100%
James Crawford, Jr. 89%
Billy James Creech 67%
Arlie Franklin Culp, Jr. 100%
William Thomas Culpepper III 88%
William Pete Cunningham 100%
Walter Dalton 100%
Charlie Dannelly 100%
Donald Spencer Davis 60%
Michael Decker, Sr. 20%
Andrew Thomas Dedmon 100%
Jerry Dockham 50%
Ruth Easterling 100%
Rick Louis Eddins 56%
Zeno Edwards, Jr. 100%
James Samuel Ellis 56%
Theresa Harlow Esposito 75%
Milton Fitch, Jr. 100%
James Forrester 86%
Stanley Harold Fox 100%
Linda Garrou 100%
John Garwood 57%
Pryor Gibson III 100%
Mitch Gillespie 56%
Wayne Goodwin 100%
William Grady 67%
Lyons Gray 100%
Jim Gulley 78%
Wilbur Gulley 100%
Joe Hackney 100%
Kay Hagan 100%
Robert Phillip Haire 100%
Oscar Harris 100%
Robert Jonathan Hensley, Jr. 100%
William Seth Hiatt 22%
Dewey Hill 100%
George Milton Holmes 44%
Hamilton Horton, Jr. 57%
David Hoyle, Sr. 86%
Howard Hunter, Jr. 67%
John Hurley 100%
Mary Jarrell 100%
Margaret Jeffus 100%
Luther Henry Jordan, Jr. 100%
Larry Thomas Justus 44%
John Kerr III 86%
Eleanor Kinnaird 100%
Joe Kiser 33%
Howard Nathaniel Lee 100%
Jeanne Hopkins Lucas 100%
Robert Martin 83%
William Martin 100%
Mary McAllister 78%
Daniel McComas 100%
Willard Eugene McCombs 67%
Marian McLawhorn 100%
William Edwin McMahan 100%
Stephen Metcalf 100%
Paul Miller 100%
Brad Miller 86%
David Morris Miner 88%
William Franklin Mitchell 67%
Kenneth Moore 71%
Richard Morgan 88%
Amelia Morris 78%
Martin Nesbitt, Jr. 89%
Edd Nye 89%
Thomas LaFontine Odom, Sr. 86%
Warren Claude Oldham 100%
William Owens, Jr. 78%
Aaron Plyler 100%
Jean Preston 67%
William Purcell 100%
Anthony Rand 100%
John Melvin Rayfield 56%
David Redwine 100%
Eric Miller Reeves 86%
Dan Robinson 100%
Richard Eugene Rogers 88%
Carolyn Barnes Russell 78%
Drew Saunders 100%
Paul Wayne Sexton, Sr. 44%
Larry Shaw 100%
Robert Shaw 86%
Wilma Sherrill 88%
Ronald Smith 75%
Robert Soles, Jr. 86%
Edgar Starnes 33%
Ronnie Sutton 75%
W. B. Teague, Jr. 38%
Gregory James Thompson 78%
Joe Tolson 100%
Russell Tucker 100%
William Wainwright 100%
Trudi Walend 75%
Edward 'Alexander Warner, Jr. 83%
Edith Warren 100%
Edward Warren 100%
Nurham Osbie Warwick 67%
Hugh Webster 50%
David Weinstein 100%
Allen Wellons 100%
Constance Wilson 78%
William Eugene Wilson 67%
Larry Womble 78%
Thomas Wright 100%
Douglas Yongue 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top