Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado State Shooting Association

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Lauri Clapp 100%
F. Jim Dyer 100%
Lynn Christian Hefley 100%
Raymond Rose 100%
Debbie Stafford 100%
Albert White 100%
Greg Brophy 88%
CO State Senate 12 Bill Cadman Republican 88%
Bill Crane 88%
Richard Decker 88%
Bob Hagedorn 88%
Ted Harvey 88%
Diane Hoppe 88%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 88%
CO State Senate 15 Kevin Lundberg Republican 88%
Michael May 88%
Ronny May 88%
Andrew McElhany 88%
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen 88%
Shawn Mitchell 88%
David Schultheis 88%
Jack Taylor 88%
Tom Wiens 88%
John Witwer 88%
CO State Senate 27 David Balmer Republican 80%
Bernie Buescher 80%
Mark Alan Cloer 80%
Kathleen Curry 80%
Dale Hall 80%
Matthew Knoedler 80%
Larry Liston 80%
Thomas Massey, Jr. 80%
Wes McKinley 80%
Joshua Penry 80%
Nancy Spence 80%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 80%
Mark Larson 72%
James Sullivan 64%
CO State Senate 28 Nancy Todd Democratic 56%
Fran Coleman 48%
Michael Garcia 48%
Bob McCluskey, Jr. 48%
CO State Senate 11 Michael Merrifield Democratic 32%
Judy Solano 32%
Suzanne Williams 32%
Stephanie Takis 24%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 16%
Angie Paccione 16%
James Riesberg 16%
Bob Bacon 0%
Alice Borodkin 0%
Betty Boyd 0%
Terrance Carroll 0%
K. Jerry Frangas 0%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 0%
Peter Groff 0%
Deanna Hanna 0%
CO State Senate 25 Mary Hodge Democratic 0%
Joel Judd 0%
Alice Madden 0%
Rosemary Marshall 0%
Tom Plant 0%
John Pommer 0%
Ann Ragsdale 0%
Andrew Romanoff 0%
Ron Tupa 0%
Jennifer Veiga 0%
Valentin Vigil 0%
Paul Weissmann 0%
Sue Windels 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top