Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Right to Life Committee

2003-2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 0%
Gary Ackerman 0%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 0%
Todd Akin 91%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Wayne Allard 100%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 0%
Rob Andrews 0%
Joe Baca, Sr. 0%
Spencer Bachus 100%
Brian Baird 0%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
Cass Ballenger 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 91%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 27%
Max Baucus 18%
Evan Bayh 18%
Bob Beauprez 100%
Chris Bell 0%
Bob Bennett 100%
Douglas Bereuter 91%
Shelley Berkley 0%
Howard Berman 0%
Marion Berry 91%
Judy Biggert 36%
Michael Bilirakis 100%
Jeff Bingaman 9%
Tim Bishop 0%
Sherwood Boehlert 36%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 100%
Mary Bono Mack 55%
Leonard Boswell 20%
Rick Boucher 9%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 40%
John Breaux 100%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Ginny Brown-Waite 100%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Max Burns 100%
Dan Burton 86%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 36%
Dave Camp 100%
Ben Campbell 82%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 18%
Brad Carson 67%
Julia Carson 0%
Edward Case 0%
Mike Castle 36%
Linc Chafee 9%
Saxby Chambliss 100%
Ben Chandler III 67%
Chris Chocola 100%
Hillary Clinton 0%
Howard Coble 100%
Norm Coleman 100%
Michael Collins 100%
Kent Conrad 55%
Jon Corzine 0%
Jerry Costello 91%
Christopher Cox 100%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 73%
Philip Crane 100%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Randall Cunningham 100%
Thomas Daschle 27%
Artur Davis 36%
James Davis 18%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Lincoln Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 91%
Bill Delahunt 0%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 91%
Peter Deutsch 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 100%
Norm Dicks 0%
John Dingell 27%
Chris Dodd 0%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
Calvin Dooley 9%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 64%
David Dreier 100%
Jennifer Dunn 64%
John Edwards 0%
Chet Edwards 9%
Vern Ehlers 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 91%
Philip English 100%
John Ensign 91%
Bob Etheridge 18%
Lane Evans 0%
Terry Everett 100%
Tom Feeney 91%
Russ Feingold 9%
Michael Ferguson 100%
Bob Filner 0%
Peter Fitzgerald 100%
Mark Foley 73%
Harold Ford, Jr. 25%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 100%
Barney Frank 0%
William Frist 100%
Jonas Frost III 0%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 0%
Jim Gerlach 91%
Jim Gibbons 91%
Wayne Gilchrest 45%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Phil Gingrey 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 100%
Bart Gordon 36%
Porter Goss 100%
Daniel Graham 0%
Mark Green 100%
James Greenwood 10%
Judd Gregg 90%
Gilbert Gutknecht 91%
Ralph Hall 100%
Tom Harkin 0%
Jane Harman 0%
Katherine Harris 100%
Melissa Hart 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 100%
Robert Hayes 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Baron Hill 45%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
David Lee Hobson 91%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 0%
Pete Hoekstra 100%
Thomas Holden 91%
Ernest Hollings 36%
Rush Holt, Jr. 0%
Darlene Hooley 0%
John Nathan Hostettler 91%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 36%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Kay Hutchison 90%
Henry Hyde 100%
Daniel Inouye 0%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
William Jefferson 50%
James Merrill Jeffords 18%
William Lewis Jenkins 100%
Christopher John 100%
Nancy Johnson 9%
Tim Johnson 100%
Timothy Johnson 18%
Paul Kanjorski 82%
Ric Keller 100%
Sue Kelly 45%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Mark Kennedy 100%
Patrick Kennedy 18%
Dale Kildee 91%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 0%
Jack Kingston 100%
Gerald Kleczka 22%
Joseph Knollenberg 100%
Herb Kohl 0%
James Kolbe 9%
Dennis Kucinich 22%
Jon Kyl 100%
Ray LaHood 100%
Nicholas Lampson 27%
Mary Landrieu 55%
Tom Lantos 0%
Tom Latham 100%
Steve LaTourette 100%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
James Leach 50%
Carl Levin 0%
Jerry Lewis 91%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 0%
Blanche Lincoln 36%
John Linder 100%
William Lipinski 89%
Trent Lott, Sr. 91%
Ken Lucas 91%
Dick Lugar 100%
Denise Majette 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top