or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Association of Washington Business

2001 State Senate Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
WA State Senate 1 Rosemary McAuliffe Democratic 37%
WA Council Member 5 Julia Patterson Democratic 37%
WA State Senate 12 Linda Parlette Republican 100%
WA State Senate 15 Jim Honeyford Republican 95%
WA State Senate 16 Mike Hewitt Republican 100%
WA State Senate 17 Donald Benton Republican 94%
WA State Senate 22 Karen Fraser Democratic 32%
WA State Senate 24 Jim Hargrove Democratic 58%
WA State Senate 25 Jim Kastama Democratic 42%
WA State Senate 30 Tracey Eide Democratic 42%
WA State Senate 31 Pam Roach Republican 88%
WA State Senate 35 Timothy Sheldon Democratic 83%
WA State Senate 36 Jeanne Kohl-Welles Democratic 32%
WA State Senate 37 Adam Kline Democratic 33%
Lisa Brown 37%
Don Carlson 83%
Dow Constantine 32%
Jeralita Costa 33%
Alex Deccio 93%
Darlene Fairley 29%
Bill Finkbeiner 84%
Rosa Franklin 37%
Georgia Anne Gardner 42%
Patricia Hale 95%
Mary Haugen 44%
Harold Hochstatter 95%
James Horn 100%
Ken Jacobsen 37%
Stephen Johnson 95%
Jeanine Long 89%
Robert McCaslin 89%
Dan McDonald 100%
Bob Morton 95%
Robert Oke 89%
Margarita Prentice 37%
Marilyn Rasmussen 63%
Debbie Regala 33%
Dino Rossi 100%
Larry Sheahan 95%
Betti Sheldon 37%
Paull Shin 42%
Sid Snyder 39%
Harriet Spanel 37%
Val Stevens 100%
Dan Swecker 89%
Patricia Thibaudeau 32%
James West 100%
Shirley Winsley 67%
Joseph Zarelli 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top