Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Tax Limitation Committee

2009-2010 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 0%
Gary Ackerman 0%
John Adler 21%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 0%
Todd Akin 95%
Rodney Alexander 93%
Jason Altmire 22%
Rob Andrews 0%
Michael Arcuri 20%
Steve Austria 91%
Joe Baca, Sr. 2%
Michele Bachmann 95%
Spencer Bachus 93%
Brian Baird 14%
J. Gresham Barrett 68%
John Barrow 16%
Roscoe Bartlett 88%
Max Baucus 6%
Evan Bayh 33%
Melissa Bean 11%
Mark Begich 0%
Bob Bennett 78%
Shelley Berkley 4%
Howard Berman 0%
Marion Berry 32%
Judy Biggert 80%
Brian Bilbray 80%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Tim Bishop 0%
John Boccieri 15%
Kit Bond 68%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 95%
Mary Bono Mack 84%
Dan Boren 35%
Leonard Boswell 2%
Rick Boucher 19%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 17%
Bruce Braley 0%
Bobby Bright 64%
Paul Broun 95%
Henry Brown, Jr. 85%
Scott Brown 60%
Ginny Brown-Waite 80%
Jim Bunning 81%
Max Burns 96%
Roland Burris 0%
Dan Burton 98%
Steve Buyer 80%
Dave Camp 85%
John Campbell III 86%
Eric Cantor 95%
Joseph Cao 39%
Dennis Cardoza 4%
Russ Carnahan 0%
Christopher Carney 10%
Brad Carson 0%
Mike Castle 49%
Saxby Chambliss 95%
Ben Chandler III 19%
Travis Childers 31%
Howard Coble 93%
Thomas Coburn 100%
Kent Conrad 3%
Jerry Costello 11%
Mark Critz 3%
Kathy Dahlkemper 15%
Artur Davis 17%
Geoff Davis 90%
Lincoln Davis 27%
Bill Delahunt 2%
James DeMint 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 73%
Norm Dicks 0%
John Dingell 4%
Chris Dodd 0%
Byron Dorgan 3%
David Dreier 93%
Steve Driehaus 12%
Chet Edwards 28%
Vern Ehlers 64%
Brad Ellsworth 19%
Jo Ann Emerson 89%
Karan English 0%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 2%
Russ Feingold 22%
Bob Filner 2%
Floyd Flake 98%
Barney Frank 0%
Elton Gallegly 91%
Jim Gerlach 75%
Gabrielle Giffords 12%
Phil Gingrey 95%
Charlie Gonzalez 0%
Bart Gordon 6%
Judd Gregg 70%
Parker Griffith, Jr. 68%
Kay Hagan 8%
John Hall 0%
Ralph Hall 93%
Debbie Halvorson 13%
Phil Hare 2%
Tom Harkin 0%
Jane Harman 4%
Claude Harris 91%
Doc Hastings 95%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 33%
Baron Hill 26%
Maurice Hinchey 2%
Paul Hodes 0%
Pete Hoekstra 90%
Thomas Holden 20%
Rush Holt, Jr. 0%
Kay Hutchison 74%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 90%
Daniel Inouye 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
Mike Johanns 84%
Timothy Johnson 0%
Tim Johnson 75%
Steve Kagen 4%
Paul Kanjorski 5%
Ted Kaufman 3%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 2%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 2%
Mary Jo Kilroy 2%
Jack Kingston 100%
Larry Kissell 22%
Ron Klein 2%
Herb Kohl 3%
Suzanne Kosmas 12%
Dennis Kucinich 10%
Jon Kyl 97%
Mary Landrieu 3%
Tom Latham 91%
Steve LaTourette 69%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
Chris Lee 84%
George LeMieux 93%
Carl Levin 3%
Jerry Lewis 93%
Joe Lieberman 11%
Blanche Lincoln 15%
John Linder 89%
Dick Lugar 81%
Dan Lungren 90%
Connie Mack IV 100%
Dan Maffei 8%
Don Manzullo 90%
Betsy Markey 23%
Jim Marshall 27%
Eric Massa 14%
Jim Matheson 31%
Carolyn McCarthy 0%
Thaddeus McCotter 82%
Mike McIntyre 31%
Buck McKeon 88%
J. Alex McMillan 16%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 6%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 24%
Mike Michaud 4%
Gary Miller 97%
George Miller 0%
Brad Miller 0%
Walt Minnick 41%
Harry Mitchell 40%
Alan Mollohan 6%
Dennis Moore 0%
Jim Moran, Jr. 0%
Patrick Murphy 7%
Scott Murphy 16%
Sue Myrick 95%
Ben Nelson 37%
Glenn Nye III 40%
Jim Oberstar 4%
Dave Obey 2%
John Olver 0%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 6%
Bill Owens 12%
Ed Pastor 0%
Donald Payne 0%
Tom Perriello 17%
Tom Petri 87%
Todd Platts 76%
Earl Pomeroy 6%
Mark Pryor 7%
George Radanovich 70%
Nick Rahall II 6%
Denny Rehberg 89%
Silvestre Reyes 2%
Laura Richardson 2%
Jay Rockefeller IV 0%
Ciro Rodriguez 6%
Mike Rogers 82%
Mike Ross 25%
Steve Rothman 0%
Mark Schauer 11%
Jean Schmidt 95%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top