Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Tax Limitation Committee

1995-1996 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Michael Oxley 98%
Ronald Packard 100%
Mike Parker 90%
William Paxon 100%
Donald Payne 5%
Lewis Payne, Jr. 30%
Clay Pell 17%
Pete Peterson 10%
Owen Pickett 46%
Richard Pombo 100%
Earl Pomeroy 20%
John Edward Porter 73%
Glenn Poshard 39%
Larry Pressler 83%
Deborah Pryce 98%
David Pryor 10%
Jack Quinn 81%
George Radanovich 100%
James Ramstad 88%
Ralph Regula 95%
Bill Richardson 0%
Frank Riggs 100%
Lynn Nancy Rivers 12%
Charles Robb 31%
Timothy Roemer 37%
Charles Rose III 0%
Toby Roth 80%
William Roth, Jr. 97%
Marge Roukema 65%
Martin Olav Sabo 5%
Rick Santorum 97%
Paul Sarbanes 3%
Jim Saxton 83%
Joe Scarborough 88%
Daniel Schaefer 100%
Steven Schiff 87%
Pat Schroeder 15%
John Shadegg 98%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 93%
Christopher Shays 81%
E.G. Shuster 100%
Paul Simon 5%
Alan Simpson 72%
Norman Sisisky 51%
David Skaggs 7%
Joseph Skeen 98%
Ike Skelton 58%
Linda Smith 95%
Nick Smith 98%
Bob Smith 100%
Olympia Snowe 83%
Gerald B.H. Solomon 100%
Mark Souder 93%
Arlen Specter 79%
Floyd Spence 100%
John Spratt, Jr. 20%
Pete Stark 5%
Cliff Stearns 100%
Charles Stenholm 49%
Ted Stevens 86%
Louis Stokes 6%
Gerry Studds 0%
Bob Stump 100%
Bart Stupak 17%
James Talent 100%
John Tanner 55%
William Tauzin 90%
Charles Taylor 100%
Gene Taylor 59%
Craig Thomas 97%
William Thomas 98%
Fred Thompson 97%
Ray Thornton 0%
Karen Thurman 25%
Strom Thurmond 100%
Todd Tiahrt 98%
Esteban Edward Torres 0%
Robert Torricelli 24%
Ed Towns 5%
James Traficant, Jr. 51%
Bruce Vento 5%
Harold Volkmer 21%
Barbara Vucanovich 90%
James Walsh 85%
Zach Wamp 90%
John Warner 97%
Mel Watt 2%
Julius Caesar Watts, Jr. 95%
David Weldon 100%
W. Curtis Weldon 87%
Gerald Weller 100%
Paul Wellstone 14%
Rick White 98%
Pat Williams 0%
Charles Wilson 10%
Bob Wise, Jr. 10%
Lynn Woolsey 2%
Albert Wynn 22%
Sidney Yates 3%
Bill Young 95%
Bill Zeliff 85%
Richard Zimmer 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top