Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Forest and Paper Association

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 25%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 42%
Todd Akin 91%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Wayne Allard 100%
Thomas Allen 16%
Rob Andrews 9%
Joe Baca, Sr. 54%
Brian Baird 36%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 83%
Roscoe Bartlett 66%
Max Baucus 60%
Evan Bayh 42%
Melissa Bean 50%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 25%
Howard Berman 16%
Marion Berry 83%
Judy Biggert 75%
Jeff Bingaman 57%
Kit Bond 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 91%
Mary Bono Mack 83%
Dan Boren 91%
Leonard Boswell 70%
Rick Boucher 66%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 58%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Ginny Brown-Waite 91%
Jim Bunning 100%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 57%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 83%
Dennis Cardoza 41%
Russ Carnahan 16%
Julia Carson 9%
Mike Castle 50%
Ben Chandler III 33%
Hillary Clinton 42%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 57%
Jerry Costello 50%
Larry Craig 85%
Robert Cramer 81%
Barbara Cubin 91%
Artur Davis 75%
Geoff Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 70%
Lincoln Davis 66%
Thomas Davis III 75%
Bill Delahunt 16%
James DeMint 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 90%
Norm Dicks 36%
Chris Dodd 33%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 91%
Byron Dorgan 42%
Thelma Drake 91%
David Dreier 91%
Chet Edwards 83%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 100%
Philip English 100%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 33%
Terry Everett 100%
Tom Feeney 75%
Russ Feingold 14%
Michael Ferguson 58%
Bob Filner 16%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 91%
Barney Frank 16%
Elton Gallegly 91%
Wayne Gilchrest 58%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 50%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 91%
Bart Gordon 58%
Judd Gregg 85%
Jane Harman 30%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Robert Hayes 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 75%
Maurice Hinchey 16%
David Lee Hobson 100%
Pete Hoekstra 100%
Thomas Holden 66%
Darlene Hooley 16%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 91%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 83%
Daniel Inouye 57%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 16%
William Jefferson 66%
Tim Johnson 58%
Paul Kanjorski 36%
Ric Keller 91%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 28%
Patrick Kennedy 20%
Dale Kildee 16%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 16%
Joseph Knollenberg 100%
Herb Kohl 57%
Dennis Kucinich 16%
John Kuhl, Jr. 100%
Jon Kyl 85%
Ray LaHood 75%
Tom Lantos 16%
Steve LaTourette 83%
Frank Lautenberg 14%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 100%
Dan Lungren 100%
Connie Mack IV 66%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 75%
Melquiades Martinez 85%
Thaddeus McCotter 83%
James McCrery III 100%
John McHugh 91%
Michael McNulty 16%
Martin Meehan 18%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 16%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 91%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 16%
Brad Miller 16%
Alan Mollohan 58%
Dennis Moore 41%
Jack Murtha 72%
Marilyn Musgrave 90%
Sue Myrick 100%
Ben Nelson 100%
Jim Oberstar 25%
Dave Obey 16%
John Olver 9%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 83%
Ron Paul 44%
Donald Payne 22%
John Peterson 100%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 100%
Todd Platts 83%
Earl Pomeroy 58%
Jon Porter, Sr. 100%
Deborah Pryce 100%
George Radanovich 100%
James Ramstad 58%
Ralph Regula 100%
Denny Rehberg 91%
Richard Renzi 100%
Silvestre Reyes 63%
Thomas Reynolds 100%
Mike Ross 75%
Steve Rothman 16%
Ken Salazar 57%
Jim Saxton 50%
Jean Schmidt 100%
John Shadegg 91%
Christopher Shays 50%
Ike Skelton 75%
Gordon Smith 100%
Olympia Snowe 71%
Vic Snyder 33%
Hilda Solis 16%
Mark Souder 100%
Arlen Specter 85%
John Spratt, Jr. 16%
Pete Stark 18%
Cliff Stearns 91%
Ted Stevens 100%
Bart Stupak 22%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sununu 66%
Tom Tancredo 83%
John Tanner 83%
Ellen Tauscher 25%
Gene Taylor 66%
Craig Thomas 85%
Todd Tiahrt 91%
Ed Towns 60%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 16%
George Voinovich 85%
James Walsh 83%
Zach Wamp 91%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 16%
Mel Watt 16%
Anthony Weiner 16%
David Weldon 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top