Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Family Institute of Connecticut Action

2007-2008 Forcing Plan B on Christian Hospitals Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
CT State House 3 Minnie Gonzalez Democratic 50%
CT State House 23 Marilyn Giuliano Republican 50%
CT State House 68 Sean Williams Republican 50%
CT State House 69 Art O'Neill Republican 50%
CT State House 71 Tony D'Amelio Republican 50%
CT State House 74 Selim Noujaim Republican 50%
CT State House 76 John Piscopo Republican 50%
CT State House 79 Frank Nicastro, Sr. Democratic 50%
CT State House 82 Buddy Altobello, Jr. Democratic 50%
CT State House 86 Vin Candelora Republican 50%
CT State House 90 Mary Fritz Democratic 50%
CT State House 103 Al Adinolfi Republican 50%
CT State House 107 David Scribner Republican 50%
CT State House 111 John Frey Republican 50%
CT State House 131 David Labriola Republican 50%
CT State House 142 Larry Cafero, Jr. Republican 50%
CT State Senate 8 Kevin Witkos Republican 50%
CT State Senate 23 Andres Ayala, Jr. Democratic 50%
CT Commissioner of the Department of Administrative Services Don DeFronzo Democratic 50%
CT Mayor At-Large John Harkins Republican 50%
CT Council Member 2 Tom Christiano Democratic 50%
CT Council Member At-Large Anne Ruwet Republican 50%
David Aldarondo 50%
Mary Carson 50%
Dan Debicella 50%
Kevin DelGobbo 50%
Ruth Fahrbach 50%
Richard Ferrari 50%
Leonard Greene, Sr. 50%
William Hamzy 50%
Raymond Kalinowski 50%
Robert Keeley, Jr. 50%
Faith McMahon 50%
Felipe Reinoso 50%
T.R. Rowe 50%
Christel Truglia 50%
Julia Wasserman 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top