| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | State House | 3 | Minnie Gonzalez | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 14 | Bill Aman | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 33 | Joseph Serra | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 41 | Elissa Wright | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 53 | Bryan Hurlburt | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 69 | Arthur O'Neill | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 73 | Jeffrey Berger | Democratic | 100% |
| CT | State House | 90 | Mary Fritz | Democratic | 100% |
| CT | State House | 92 | Patricia Dillon | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 103 | Alfred Adinolfi | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 110 | Bob Godfrey | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 112 | Debra Lee Hovey | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 131 | David Labriola | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 138 | Jan Giegler | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 140 | Bruce Morris | Democratic | 100% |
| CT | State House | 146 | Gerald Fox III | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 147 | William Tong | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State Senate | 2 | Eric Coleman | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State Senate | 5 | Beth Bye | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State Senate | 7 | John Kissel | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State Senate | 12 | Edward Meyer | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | Justice of the Supreme Court | Andrew McDonald | 0% | ||
| Ryan Barry | 0% | ||||
| David Cappiello | 100% | ||||
| John Geragosian | 0% | ||||
| Edwin Gomes | 0% | ||||
| Kenneth Green | 0% | ||||
| Gail Hamm | 0% | ||||
| William Hamzy | 100% | ||||
| Mary Handley | 0% | ||||
| Michael Lawlor | 0% | ||||
| David McCluskey | 0% | ||||
| Timothy O'Brien, Jr. | 0% | ||||
| Claudia Powers | 100% | ||||
| Melissa Riley | 0% | ||||
| Andrew Roraback | 0% | ||||
| T.R. Rowe | 100% | ||||
| James Field Spallone | 0% | ||||
| Cameron Staples | 0% | ||||
| Christopher Stone | 100% | ||||
| Toni Walker | 0% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Family Institute of Connecticut Action
2007-2008 Same-Sex Marriage Vote Score
Issues:
Marriage, Family, and Children
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
