| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | State House | 103 | Alfred Adinolfi | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 14 | Bill Aman | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 73 | Jeffrey Berger | Democratic | 100% |
| David Cappiello | 100% | ||||
| CT | State House | 90 | Mary Fritz | Democratic | 100% |
| CT | State House | 138 | Jan Giegler | Republican | 100% |
| William Hamzy | 100% | ||||
| CT | State House | 112 | Debra Lee Hovey | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State Senate | 7 | John Kissel | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 131 | David Labriola | Republican | 100% |
| CT | State House | 140 | Bruce Morris | Democratic | 100% |
| CT | State House | 69 | Arthur O'Neill | Republican | 100% |
| Claudia Powers | 100% | ||||
| T.R. Rowe | 100% | ||||
| Christopher Stone | 100% | ||||
| Ryan Barry | 0% | ||||
| CT | State Senate | 5 | Beth Bye | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State Senate | 2 | Eric Coleman | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 92 | Patricia Dillon | Democratic | 0% |
| CT | State House | 146 | Gerald Fox III | Democratic | 0% |
| John Geragosian | 0% | ||||
| CT | State House | 110 | Bob Godfrey | Democratic | 0% |
| Edwin Gomes | 0% | ||||
| CT | State House | 3 | Minnie Gonzalez | Democratic | 0% |
| Kenneth Green | 0% | ||||
| Gail Hamm | 0% | ||||
| Mary Handley | 0% | ||||
| CT | State House | 53 | Bryan Hurlburt | Democratic | 0% |
| Michael Lawlor | 0% | ||||
| David McCluskey | 0% | ||||
| CT | Justice of the Supreme Court | Andrew McDonald | 0% | ||
| CT | State Senate | 12 | Edward Meyer | Democratic | 0% |
| Timothy O'Brien, Jr. | 0% | ||||
| Melissa Riley | 0% | ||||
| Andrew Roraback | 0% | ||||
| CT | State House | 33 | Joseph Serra | Democratic | 0% |
| James Field Spallone | 0% | ||||
| Cameron Staples | 0% | ||||
| CT | State House | 147 | William Tong | Democratic | 0% |
| Toni Walker | 0% | ||||
| CT | State House | 41 | Elissa Wright | Democratic | 0% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Family Institute of Connecticut Action
2007-2008 Same-Sex Marriage Vote Score
Issues:
Marriage, Family, and Children
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
