Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Americans for Prosperity - Nebraska Chapter

2012 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
NE U.S. Senate Sr Deb Fischer Republican 100%
NE U.S. House 2 Brad Ashford Democratic 78%
NE State Senate 5 Heath Mello Non-partisan 78%
NE State Senate 8 Burke Harr Non-partisan 70%
NE State Senate 10 Bob Krist Non-partisan 67%
NE State Senate 13 Tanya Cook Non-partisan 56%
NE State Senate 14 Jim Smith Non-partisan 80%
NE State Senate 16 Lydia Brasch Non-partisan 90%
NE State Senate 17 Dave Bloomfield Non-partisan 90%
NE State Senate 21 Ken Haar Non-partisan 60%
NE State Senate 22 Paul Schumacher Non-partisan 60%
NE State Senate 25 Kathy Campbell Non-partisan 70%
NE State Senate 27 Colby Coash Non-partisan 70%
NE State Senate 33 Lester Seiler Non-partisan 67%
NE State Senate 35 Mike Gloor Non-partisan 78%
NE State Senate 37 Galen Hadley Non-partisan 70%
NE State Senate 39 Beau McCoy Non-partisan 90%
NE State Senate 40 Tyson Larson Non-partisan 70%
NE State Senate 41 Kate Sullivan Non-partisan 70%
NE State Senate 47 Ken Schilz Non-partisan 70%
NE Auditor of Public Accounts Charlie Janssen Republican 100%
NE Council Member 5 Rich Pahls 70%
Gregory Adams 89%
William Avery 70%
Tom Carlson 67%
Mark Christensen 80%
Danielle Conrad 33%
Abbie Cornett 67%
Brenda Council 83%
Annette Dubas 60%
Mike Flood 80%
Tony Fulton 100%
Thomas Hansen 100%
John Harms 70%
Lavon Heidemann 100%
Gwen Howard 60%
Russ Karpisek 67%
Paul Lambert 78%
Chris Langemeier 100%
Steve Lathrop 70%
Scott Lautenbaugh 86%
LeRoy Louden 56%
Amanda McGill 60%
John Nelson 90%
Jeremy Nordquist 67%
Pete Pirsch 89%
Scott Price 80%
Norman Wallman 60%
John Wightman 78%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top