| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NV | State Assembly | 1 | Marilyn Kirkpatrick | Democratic | 0% |
| NV | State Assembly | 3 | Margaret Pierce | Democratic | 0% |
| NV | State Assembly | 6 | Harvey Munford | Democratic | 0% |
| NV | State Assembly | 10 | Joseph Hogan | Democratic | 5% |
| NV | State Assembly | 34 | William Horne | Democratic | 0% |
| NV | State Assembly | 38 | Tom Grady | Republican | 20% |
| NV | State Senate | 2 | Mo Denis | Democratic | 0% |
| NV | State Senate | 4 | Kelvin Atkinson | Democratic | 0% |
| NV | State Senate | 7 | David Parks | Democratic | 5% |
| NV | State Senate | 12 | Joseph Hardy | Republican | 25% |
| NV | State Senate | 13 | Debbie Smith | Democratic | 5% |
| NV | State Senate | 19 | Pete Goicoechea | Republican | 15% |
| NV | State Senate | 21 | Mark Manendo | Democratic | 10% |
| Francis Allen | 15% | ||||
| Bernard Anderson | 0% | ||||
| Sharron Angle | 50% | ||||
| Morse Arberry, Jr. | 0% | ||||
| Barbara Buckley | 5% | ||||
| John Carpenter | 15% | ||||
| Chad Christensen | 30% | ||||
| Jerry Claborn | 5% | ||||
| Marcus Conklin | 0% | ||||
| Heidi Gansert | 25% | ||||
| Susan Gerhardt | 5% | ||||
| Christina Giunchigliani | 0% | ||||
| Lynn Hettrick | 35% | ||||
| Brooks Stevens Holcomb | 15% | ||||
| Ellen Koivisto | 10% | ||||
| Sheila Leslie | 5% | ||||
| R. Garn Mabey, Jr. | 40% | ||||
| John Marvel | 25% | ||||
| Kathryn McClain | 0% | ||||
| Bob McCleary | 0% | ||||
| Harry Mortenson | 0% | ||||
| John Oceguera | 0% | ||||
| Eugenia Ohrenschall | 5% | ||||
| Bonnie Parnell | 0% | ||||
| Richard Perkins | 5% | ||||
| Robert Seale | 20% | ||||
| Roderick Sherer | 35% | ||||
| Scott Sibley | 5% | ||||
| Valerie Weber | 25% |
Issues:
Conservative
,
Budget, Spending and Taxes
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
