Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Voices for Children in Nebraska

2011-2012 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gregory Adams 0%
NE U.S. House 2 Brad Ashford Democratic 67%
William Avery 42%
NE State Senate 17 Dave Bloomfield Non-partisan 8%
NE State Senate 16 Lydia Brasch Non-partisan 8%
NE State Senate 25 Kathy Campbell Non-partisan 67%
Tom Carlson 33%
Mark Christensen 33%
NE State Senate 27 Colby Coash Non-partisan 67%
Danielle Conrad 100%
NE State Senate 13 Tanya Cook Non-partisan 100%
Abbie Cornett 42%
Brenda Council 100%
Annette Dubas 100%
NE U.S. Senate Sr Deb Fischer Republican 0%
Mike Flood 8%
Tony Fulton 8%
NE State Senate 35 Mike Gloor Non-partisan 67%
NE State Senate 21 Ken Haar Non-partisan 92%
NE State Senate 37 Galen Hadley Non-partisan 42%
Thomas Hansen 0%
John Harms 42%
NE State Senate 8 Burke Harr Non-partisan 83%
Lavon Heidemann 0%
Gwen Howard 92%
NE Auditor of Public Accounts Charlie Janssen Republican 0%
Russ Karpisek 67%
NE State Senate 10 Bob Krist Non-partisan 83%
Paul Lambert 0%
Chris Langemeier 0%
NE State Senate 40 Tyson Larson Non-partisan 50%
Steve Lathrop 67%
Scott Lautenbaugh 0%
LeRoy Louden 83%
NE State Senate 39 Beau McCoy Non-partisan 8%
Amanda McGill 100%
NE State Senate 5 Heath Mello Non-partisan 92%
John Nelson 8%
Jeremy Nordquist 92%
NE Council Member 5 Rich Pahls 0%
Pete Pirsch 17%
Scott Price 17%
NE State Senate 47 Ken Schilz Non-partisan 17%
NE State Senate 22 Paul Schumacher Non-partisan 67%
NE State Senate 33 Les Seiler Non-partisan 42%
NE State Senate 14 Jim Smith Non-partisan 42%
NE State Senate 41 Kate Sullivan Non-partisan 58%
Norman Wallman 100%
John Wightman 42%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top