| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samuel Aanestad | 19% | ||||
| Elaine Alquist | 100% | ||||
| Roy Ashburn | 38% | ||||
| Sam Blakeslee | 40% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 30 | Ron Calderon | Democratic | 94% |
| Gilbert Cedillo | 100% | ||||
| CA | Councilmember | At-Large | David Cogdill | Republican | 25% |
| CA | State Senate | 10 | Ellen Corbett | Democratic | 94% |
| CA | State Senate | 34 | Lou Correa | Democratic | 69% |
| Dave Cox | 20% | ||||
| CA | U.S. House | 10 | Jeff Denham | Republican | 25% |
| CA | State Senate | 7 | Mark DeSaulnier | Democratic | 100% |
| Denise Ducheny | 94% | ||||
| Robert Dutton | 6% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 23 | Bill Emmerson | Republican | 38% |
| Dean Florez | 100% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 9 | Loni Hancock | Democratic | 100% |
| Tom Harman | 13% | ||||
| Dennis Hollingsworth | 6% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 29 | Robert Huff | Republican | 19% |
| Christine Kehoe | 94% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 11 | Mark Leno | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 25 | Carol Liu | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | U.S. House | 47 | Alan Lowenthal | Democratic | 100% |
| Abel Maldonado | 100% | ||||
| CA | U.S. House | 35 | Gloria Negrete McLeod | Democratic | 88% |
| Jenny Oropeza | 6% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 20 | Alex Padilla | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 27 | Fran Pavley | Democratic | 94% |
| CA | State Senate | 26 | Curren Price, Jr. | Democratic | 100% |
| Gloria Romero | 100% | ||||
| George Runner, Jr. | 31% | ||||
| Saren Simitian | 81% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 6 | Darrell Steinberg | Democratic | 100% |
| Tony Strickland | 38% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 37 | Mimi Walters | Republican | 13% |
| Patricia Wiggins | 0% | ||||
| CA | State Senate | 3 | Lois Wolk | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 35 | Roderick Wright | Democratic | 81% |
| CA | State Senate | 38 | Mark Wyland | Republican | 31% |
| CA | State Senate | 8 | Leland Yee | Democratic | 100% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: American Cancer Society California Division, Inc.
2010 State Senate Score
Issues:
Health and Health Care
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
