Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona National Federation of Independent Business

2003-2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Amanda Aguirre 29%
Linda Aguirre 31%
Carolyn Allen 57%
Manny Alvarez 24%
Marsha Arzberger 57%
Ray Barnes 87%
Timothy Bee 71%
Ken Bennett 79%
Robert Blendu 75%
Tom Boone 87%
William Brotherton 36%
Jennifer Burns 94%
Robert Burns 79%
Meg Burton Cahill 22%
Robert Cannell 64%
Ted Carpenter 100%
AZ Supervisor 2 Cheryl Chase 65%
Ken Cheuvront 67%
Ted Downing 28%
Franklin Flake 94%
Steve Gallardo 17%
Jorge Garcia 36%
Gabrielle Giffords 31%
Chuck Gray 94%
Linda Gray 94%
Jack Harper 100%
Toni Hellon 69%
Pete Hershberger 67%
Steve Huffman 80%
John Huppenthal 100%
Marilyn Jarrett 79%
Karen Johnson 89%
Bill Konopnicki 87%
Leah Landrum Taylor 18%
Barbara Leff 93%
Phil Lopes 22%
Linda Lopez 24%
Dean Martin 100%
Lucy Mason 94%
Marian Ann McClure 94%
Ben Miranda 22%
Harry Mitchell 43%
John Nelson 88%
Warde Nichols 94%
Tom O'Halleran 81%
Russell Pearce 94%
Gary Pierce 100%
Thomas Prezelski, Jr. 12%
Doug Quelland 82%
Colette Rosati 94%
Victor Soltero 29%
Bob Stump 100%
Stephen Tully 88%
Thayer Verschoor 93%
AZ Council Member 2 Jim Waring 86%
AZ State Senate 10 Dave Bradley Democratic 44%
AZ State Senate 3 Olivia Cajero Bedford Democratic 39%
AZ State House 30 Debbie McCune Davis Democratic 25%
AZ State Senate 30 Robert Meza Democratic 27%
AZ Mayor At-Large Jay Tibshraeny No Party Affiliation 86%
AZ State House 15 John Allen Republican 88%
AZ State Senate 12 Andy Biggs Republican 94%
AZ State House 12 Eddie Farnsworth Republican 100%
AZ Secretary of State Michele Reagan Republican 89%
AZ State House 18 Bob Robson Republican 88%
AZ State Senate 17 Steven Yarbrough Republican 94%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top