| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Aguirre | 50% | ||||
| Carolyn Allen | 100% | ||||
| Mark Anderson | 100% | ||||
| Marsha Arzberger | 57% | ||||
| Timothy Bee | 86% | ||||
| AZ | Secretary of State | Ken Bennett | Republican | 93% | |
| Linda Binder | 83% | ||||
| Robert Blendu | 100% | ||||
| William Brotherton | 30% | ||||
| Jack Brown | 62% | ||||
| Meg Burton Cahill | 73% | ||||
| Robert Cannell | 71% | ||||
| Ted Carpenter | 89% | ||||
| James Carruthers | 70% | ||||
| Cheryl Chase | 30% | ||||
| Ken Cheuvront | 73% | ||||
| AZ | State House | 12 | Eddie Farnsworth | Republican | 100% |
| Franklin Flake | 100% | ||||
| Gabrielle Giffords | 55% | ||||
| Randy Graf | 100% | ||||
| Linda Gray | 82% | ||||
| Deb Gullett | 90% | ||||
| Phil Hanson | 91% | ||||
| Toni Hellon | 64% | ||||
| Pete Hershberger | 91% | ||||
| Steve Huffman | 88% | ||||
| AZ | Superintendent of Public Instruction | John Huppenthal | Republican | 100% | |
| Jack Jackson, Sr. | 38% | ||||
| Karen Johnson | 100% | ||||
| AZ | State Senate | 27 | Leah Landrum Taylor | Democratic | 36% |
| Sylvia Laughter | 67% | ||||
| Barbara Leff | 82% | ||||
| AZ | State Senate | 2 | Linda Lopez | Democratic | 50% |
| John Loredo | 40% | ||||
| Dean Martin | 93% | ||||
| Marian Ann McClure | 91% | ||||
| Harry Mitchell | 50% | ||||
| John Nelson | 100% | ||||
| Tom O'Halleran | 89% | ||||
| Russell Pearce | 100% | ||||
| AZ | Corporation Commissioner | Gary Pierce | Republican | 100% | |
| AZ | Supervisor | 1 | Peter Rios | Democratic | 43% |
| AZ | State House | 18 | Bob Robson | Republican | 100% |
| Victor Soltero | 36% | ||||
| Stephen Tully | 90% | ||||
| Jim Weiers | 100% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Arizona National Federation of Independent Business
2001-2002 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
