Rating Group: League of Humane Voters Washington

2007-2011 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
Gary Alexander 40%
Glenn Anderson 60%
Mike Armstrong 40%
Tom Campbell 80%
Larry Crouse 20%
Jerome Delvin 83%
Mary Lou Dickerson 80%
John Driscoll 100%
Deb Eddy 80%
Tracey Eide 100%
Fred Finn 100%
Tami Green 100%
Kathy Haigh 80%
Bill Hinkle 25%
Janéa Holmquist Newbry 50%
Mike Hope 50%
Jim Jacks 100%
Claudia Kauffman 100%
Phyllis Kenney 80%
Adam Kline 100%
WA Council Member-Ward 1 Kelli Linville 80%
Christopher Marr 83%
Marcie Maxwell 100%
Jim McCune 20%
Jim McEntire 100%
Dawn Morrell 100%
Bob Morton 50%
Eric Oemig 100%
Tim Probst 100%
Mary Helen Roberts 100%
Charles Ross 40%
Larry Seaquist 100%
Paull Shin 83%
Geoff Simpson 100%
Rodney Tom 100%
Dave Upthegrove 100%
Scott White 100%
WA State House-23 Position 1 Sherry Appleton D 100%
WA State House-19 Position 2 Brian Blake D 20%
WA State House-36 Position 1 Reuven Carlyle D 100%
WA State Senate-32 Maralyn Chase D 80%
WA State House-43 Position 2 Frank Chopp D 80%
WA State House-41 Position 2 Judy Clibborn D 80%
WA State House-34 Position 1 Eileen Cody D 100%
WA State Senate-29 Steve Conway D 80%
WA State Senate-27 Jeannie Darneille D 100%
WA State House-44 Position 1 Hans Dunshee D 100%
WA State House-45 Position 1 Roger Goodman D 80%
WA State Senate-11 Bob Hasegawa D 80%
WA State Senate-44 Steve Hobbs D 83%
WA State House-11 Position 1 Zack Hudgins D 100%
WA State House-22 Position 2 Sam Hunt D 100%
WA State House-48 Position 1 Ross Hunter D 100%
WA State House-31 Position 2 Christopher Hurst D 80%
WA State House-32 Position 2 Ruth Kagi D 100%
WA State Senate-33 Karen Keiser D 100%
WA Auditor Troy Kelley D 80%
WA U.S. House-6 Derek Kilmer D 100%
WA State House-29 Position 2 Steve Kirby D 80%
WA State Senate-36 Jeanne Kohl-Welles D 100%
WA State Senate-21 Marko Liias D 100%
WA State Senate-38 John McCoy D 100%
WA State House-49 Position 2 Jim Moeller D 80%
WA State House-40 Position 2 Jeff Morris D 100%
WA Mayor-At-Large Edward Murray D 100%
WA State Senate-34 Sharon Nelson D 100%
WA State House-3 Position 2 Timm Ormsby D 80%
WA State House-33 Position 1 Tina Orwall D 100%
WA State Senate-43 Jamie Pedersen D 100%
WA State House-37 Position 2 Eric Pettigrew D 80%
WA State Senate-23 Christine Rolfes D 100%
WA State House-37 Position 1 Sharon Tomiko Santos D 100%
WA State House-38 Position 2 Mike Sells D 80%
WA State Senate-35 Timothy Sheldon D 83%
WA State House-45 Position 2 Larry Springer D 80%
WA State House-47 Position 2 Pat Sullivan D 100%
WA State House-19 Position 1 Dean Takko D 60%
WA State House-24 Position 1 Kevin Van De Wege D 60%
WA State Senate-26 Jan Angel R 0%
WA State Senate-10 Barbara Bailey R 60%
WA State House-15 Position 1 Bruce Chandler R 20%
WA State House-12 Position 1 Cary Condotta R 20%
WA State Senate-25 Bruce Dammeier R 100%
WA State House-20 Position 1 Richard DeBolt R 40%
WA State House-8 Position 2 Larry Haler R 20%
WA State Senate-15 Jim Honeyford R 33%
WA State House-14 Position 1 Norm Johnson R 50%
WA State House-8 Position 1 Brad Klippert R 0%
WA State House-7 Position 2 Joel Kretz R 20%
WA State House-39 Position 1 Dan Kristiansen R 20%
WA State Senate-30 Mark Miloscia R 100%
WA State House-20 Position 2 Ed Orcutt R 20%
WA State House-6 Position 1 Kevin Parker R 50%
WA State Senate-39 Kirk Pearson R 20%
WA State Senate-31 Pam Roach R 67%
WA State House-5 Position 1 Jay Rodne R 80%
WA State House-9 Position 2 Joe Schmick R 0%
WA State House-4 Position 2 Matt Shea R 0%
WA State House-7 Position 1 Shelly Short R 0%
WA State House-10 Position 1 Norma Smith R 67%
WA State House-16 Position 1 Maureen Walsh R 60%
WA State Senate-13 Judy Warnick R 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.