Rating Group: League of Humane Voters Washington

2007-2011 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WA U.S. House-6 Derek Kilmer D 100%
WA State House-3 Position 2 Timm Ormsby D 80%
WA State House-4 Position 2 Matt Shea R 0%
WA State House-5 Position 1 Jay Rodne R 80%
WA State House-6 Position 1 Kevin Parker R 50%
WA State House-7 Position 1 Shelly Short R 0%
WA State House-7 Position 2 Joel Kretz R 20%
WA State House-8 Position 1 Brad Klippert R 0%
WA State House-8 Position 2 Larry Haler R 20%
WA State House-9 Position 2 Joe Schmick R 0%
WA State House-10 Position 1 Norma Smith R 67%
WA State House-11 Position 1 Zack Hudgins D 100%
WA State House-12 Position 1 Cary Condotta R 20%
WA State House-13 Position 1 Judy Warnick R 25%
WA State House-14 Position 1 Norm Johnson R 50%
WA State House-14 Position 2 Charles Ross R 40%
WA State House-15 Position 1 Bruce Chandler R 20%
WA State House-16 Position 1 Maureen Walsh R 60%
WA State House-19 Position 1 Dean Takko D 60%
WA State House-19 Position 2 Brian Blake D 20%
WA State House-20 Position 1 Richard DeBolt R 40%
WA State House-20 Position 2 Ed Orcutt R 20%
WA State House-21 Position 1 Mary Helen Roberts D 100%
WA State House-22 Position 2 Sam Hunt D 100%
WA State House-23 Position 1 Sherry Appleton D 100%
WA State House-24 Position 1 Kevin Van De Wege D 60%
WA State House-25 Position 1 Dawn Morrell D 100%
WA State House-26 Position 2 Larry Seaquist D 100%
WA State House-28 Position 2 Tami Green D 100%
WA State House-29 Position 2 Steve Kirby D 80%
WA State House-31 Position 2 Christopher Hurst D 80%
WA State House-32 Position 2 Ruth Kagi D 100%
WA State House-33 Position 1 Tina Orwall D 100%
WA State House-34 Position 1 Eileen Cody D 100%
WA State House-35 Position 1 Kathy Haigh D 80%
WA State House-36 Position 1 Reuven Carlyle D 100%
WA State House-37 Position 1 Sharon Tomiko Santos D 100%
WA State House-37 Position 2 Eric Pettigrew D 80%
WA State House-38 Position 2 Mike Sells D 80%
WA State House-39 Position 1 Dan Kristiansen R 20%
WA State House-40 Position 2 Jeff Morris D 100%
WA State House-41 Position 2 Judy Clibborn D 80%
WA State House-43 Position 2 Frank Chopp D 80%
WA State House-44 Position 1 Hans Dunshee D 100%
WA State House-45 Position 1 Roger Goodman D 80%
WA State House-45 Position 2 Larry Springer D 80%
WA State House-47 Position 2 Pat Sullivan D 100%
WA State House-48 Position 1 Ross Hunter D 100%
WA State House-49 Position 2 Jim Moeller D 80%
WA State Senate-10 Barbara Bailey R 60%
WA State Senate-11 Bob Hasegawa D 80%
WA State Senate-13 Janéa Holmquist Newbry R 50%
WA State Senate-15 Jim Honeyford R 33%
WA State Senate-21 Marko Liias D 100%
WA State Senate-23 Christine Rolfes D 100%
WA State Senate-25 Bruce Dammeier R 100%
WA State Senate-26 Jan Angel R 0%
WA State Senate-27 Jeannie Darneille D 100%
WA State Senate-29 Steve Conway D 80%
WA State Senate-30 Tracey Eide D 100%
WA State Senate-31 Pam Roach R 67%
WA State Senate-32 Maralyn Chase D 80%
WA State Senate-33 Karen Keiser D 100%
WA State Senate-34 Sharon Nelson D 100%
WA State Senate-35 Timothy Sheldon D 83%
WA State Senate-36 Jeanne Kohl-Welles D 100%
WA State Senate-37 Adam Kline D 100%
WA State Senate-38 John McCoy D 100%
WA State Senate-39 Kirk Pearson R 20%
WA State Senate-43 Jamie Pedersen D 100%
WA State Senate-44 Steve Hobbs D 83%
WA State Senate-48 Rodney Tom D 100%
WA Auditor Troy Kelley D 80%
WA Mayor-At-Large Edward Murray D 100%
Gary Alexander 40%
Glenn Anderson 60%
Mike Armstrong 40%
Tom Campbell 80%
Larry Crouse 20%
Jerome Delvin 83%
Mary Lou Dickerson 80%
John Driscoll 100%
Deb Eddy 80%
Fred Finn 100%
Bill Hinkle 25%
Mike Hope 50%
Jim Jacks 100%
Claudia Kauffman 100%
Phyllis Kenney 80%
Kelli Linville 80%
Christopher Marr 83%
Marcie Maxwell 100%
Jim McCune 20%
Jim McEntire 100%
Mark Miloscia 100%
Bob Morton 50%
Eric Oemig 100%
Tim Probst 100%
Paull Shin 83%
Geoff Simpson 100%
Dave Upthegrove 100%
Scott White 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.