Rating Group: League of Humane Voters Washington

2007-2011 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WA Commissioner-1 Jerome Delvin 83%
WA Commissioner-1 Jim McEntire R 100%
WA Councilperson-1 Pat Sullivan D 100%
WA Council Member-3 Jim McCune 20%
WA State House-3 Position 2 Timm Ormsby D 80%
WA State House-4 Position 2 Matt Shea R 0%
WA Councilman-5 Hans Dunshee D 100%
WA Council Member-5 Dave Upthegrove 100%
WA State House-5 Position 1 Jay Rodne R 80%
WA U.S. House-6 Derek Kilmer D 100%
WA State House-6 Position 1 Kevin Parker R 50%
WA State House-7 Position 1 Shelly Short R 0%
WA State House-7 Position 2 Joel Kretz R 20%
WA State House-8 Position 1 Brad Klippert R 0%
WA State House-8 Position 2 Larry Haler R 20%
WA State House-9 Position 2 Joe Schmick R 0%
WA State Senate-10 Barbara Bailey R 60%
WA State House-10 Position 1 Norma Smith R 67%
WA State Senate-11 Bob Hasegawa D 80%
WA State House-11 Position 1 Zack Hudgins D 100%
WA State House-12 Position 1 Cary Condotta R 20%
WA State Senate-13 Judy Warnick R 25%
WA State House-14 Position 1 Norm Johnson R 50%
WA State Senate-15 Jim Honeyford R 33%
WA State House-15 Position 1 Bruce Chandler R 20%
WA State House-16 Position 1 Maureen Walsh R 60%
WA State Senate-19 Dean Takko D 60%
WA State House-19 Position 2 Brian Blake D 20%
WA State House-20 Position 1 Richard DeBolt R 40%
WA State House-20 Position 2 Ed Orcutt R 20%
WA State Senate-21 Marko Liias D 100%
WA State House-22 Position 2 Sam Hunt D 100%
WA State Senate-23 Christine Rolfes D 100%
WA State House-23 Position 1 Sherry Appleton D 100%
WA State House-24 Position 1 Kevin Van De Wege D 60%
WA State Senate-25 Bruce Dammeier R 100%
WA State Senate-26 Jan Angel R 0%
WA State Senate-27 Jeannie Darneille D 100%
WA State Senate-29 Steve Conway D 80%
WA State House-29 Position 2 Steve Kirby D 80%
WA State Senate-30 Mark Miloscia R 100%
WA State Senate-31 Pam Roach R 67%
WA State House-31 Position 2 Christopher Hurst D 80%
WA State Senate-32 Maralyn Chase D 80%
WA State House-32 Position 2 Ruth Kagi D 100%
WA State Senate-33 Karen Keiser D 100%
WA State House-33 Position 1 Tina Orwall D 100%
WA State Senate-34 Sharon Nelson D 100%
WA State House-34 Position 1 Eileen Cody D 100%
WA State Senate-35 Timothy Sheldon D 83%
WA State Senate-36 Reuven Carlyle D 100%
WA State House-37 Position 1 Sharon Tomiko Santos D 100%
WA State House-37 Position 2 Eric Pettigrew D 80%
WA State Senate-38 John McCoy D 100%
WA State House-38 Position 2 Mike Sells D 80%
WA State Senate-39 Kirk Pearson R 20%
WA State House-39 Position 1 Dan Kristiansen R 20%
WA State House-40 Position 2 Jeff Morris D 100%
WA State House-41 Position 2 Judy Clibborn D 80%
WA State Senate-43 Jamie Pedersen D 100%
WA State House-43 Position 2 Frank Chopp D 80%
WA State Senate-44 Steve Hobbs D 83%
WA State House-45 Position 1 Roger Goodman D 80%
WA State House-45 Position 2 Larry Springer D 80%
WA State House-47 Position 2 Pat Sullivan D 100%
WA State House-49 Position 2 Jim Moeller D 80%
WA Mayor-At-Large Edward Murray 100%
WA Auditor Troy Kelley D 80%
Gary Alexander 40%
Glenn Anderson 60%
Mike Armstrong 40%
Tom Campbell 80%
Larry Crouse 20%
Mary Lou Dickerson 80%
John Driscoll 100%
Deb Eddy 80%
Tracey Eide 100%
Fred Finn 100%
Tami Green 100%
Kathy Haigh 80%
Bill Hinkle 25%
Janéa Holmquist Newbry 50%
Mike Hope 50%
Ross Hunter 100%
Jim Jacks 100%
Claudia Kauffman 100%
Phyllis Kenney 80%
Adam Kline 100%
Jeanne Kohl-Welles 100%
Kelli Linville 80%
Christopher Marr 83%
Marcie Maxwell 100%
Dawn Morrell 100%
Bob Morton 50%
Eric Oemig 100%
Tim Probst 100%
Mary Helen Roberts 100%
Charles Ross 40%
Larry Seaquist 100%
Paull Shin 83%
Geoff Simpson 100%
Rodney Tom 100%
Scott White 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.