Rating Group: Clean Water Action California

2009-2010 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 90%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 20%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 33%
CA U.S. House-11 Mark DeSaulnier D 88%
CA U.S. House-25 Steve Knight R 25%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 85%
CA U.S. House-33 Ted Lieu D 83%
CA U.S. House-35 Norma Torres D 65%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 85%
CA U.S. House-45 Mimi Walters R 18%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 83%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 86%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 70%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 25%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 94%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 25%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 65%
CA State Senate-8 Tom Berryhill R 20%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 94%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 90%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 90%
CA State Senate-16 Jean Fuller R 25%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-24 Kevin de Leon D 85%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 83%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 83%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 17%
CA State Senate-32 Tony Mendoza D 70%
CA State Senate-35 Isadore Hall III D 60%
CA State Senate-38 Joel Anderson R 32%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 81%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla D 83%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones D 85%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries R 15%
CA Supervisor-4 John Benoit 18%
CA Supervisor-5 Saren Simitian D 78%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo N/A 77%
CA Council Member-2 Paul Krekorian N/A 73%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield N/A 85%
CA Council Member-6 David Cogdill R 22%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes N/A 70%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. N/A 63%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Other 100%
CA State Board of Equalization Diane Harkey R 25%
CA State Board of Equalization Fiona Ma D 75%
CA State Board of Equalization George Runner, Jr. R 19%
Samuel Aanestad 13%
Anthony Adams 20%
Elaine Alquist 83%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Juan Arambula 75%
Roy Ashburn 11%
Bill Berryhill 40%
Sam Blakeslee 26%
Steven Bradford 73%
Joan Buchanan 100%
Anna Caballero 70%
Charles Calderon 88%
Ron Calderon 77%
Amina Carter 85%
Wesley Chesbro 100%
Connie Conway 20%
Ellen Corbett 94%
Lou Correa 39%
Joe Coto 85%
Mike Davis 80%
Hector De La Torre 75%
Charles DeVore 25%
Denise Ducheny 61%
Robert Dutton 22%
Michael Duvall 27%
Bill Emmerson 26%
Mike Eng 85%
Noreen Evans 100%
Mike Feuer 85%
Nathan Fletcher 30%
Dean Florez 71%
Paul Fong 100%
Warren Furutani 74%
Martin Garrick 15%
Danny Gilmore 40%
Curt Hagman 20%
Tom Harman 19%
Mary Hayashi 95%
Dennis Hollingsworth 12%
Alyson Huber 65%
Christine Kehoe 83%
Dan Logue 30%
Bonnie Lowenthal 85%
Abel Maldonado 55%
Jeff Miller 32%
Pedro Nava 85%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 67%
Brian Nestande 25%
Roger Niello 30%
Chris Norby 38%
Jenny Oropeza 83%
John Pérez 80%
Manuel Pérez 70%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 80%
Gloria Romero 78%
Ira Ruskin 90%
Mary Salas 80%
Lori Saldaña 90%
Jim Silva 15%
Nancy Skinner 100%
Cameron Smyth 30%
Jose Solorio 70%
Darrell Steinberg 83%
Tony Strickland 17%
Audra Strickland 29%
Sandré Swanson 95%
Alberto Torrico 75%
Van Tran 25%
Mike Villines 15%
Patricia Wiggins 91%
Roderick Wright 44%
Mark Wyland 11%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.