Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration]

2009-2013 Positions - Reduce Visa Lottery (Feb 11, 2013)

Issues: Immigration
State Office District Name Party Rating
TX U.S. House 26 Michael Burgess Republican 100%
TX U.S. House 27 Blake Farenthold Republican 100%
TX U.S. House 28 Henry Cuellar Democratic 100%
TX U.S. House 31 John Carter Republican 100%
TX U.S. House 32 Pete Sessions Republican 100%
UT U.S. Senate Sr Orrin Hatch Republican 100%
UT U.S. House 1 Rob Bishop Republican 100%
UT U.S. House 3 Jason Chaffetz Republican 100%
UT U.S. House 4 Jim Matheson Democratic 100%
VA U.S. House 1 Rob Wittman Republican 100%
VA U.S. House 2 Scott Rigell Republican 100%
VA U.S. House 3 Bobby Scott Democratic 0%
VA U.S. House 4 Randy Forbes Republican 100%
VA U.S. House 5 Robert Hurt Republican 100%
VA U.S. House 6 Bob Goodlatte Republican 100%
VA U.S. House 8 Jim Moran, Jr. Democratic 100%
VA U.S. House 9 Morgan Griffith Republican 100%
VA U.S. House 10 Frank Wolf Republican 100%
WA U.S. House 3 Jaime Herrera Beutler Republican 100%
WA U.S. House 5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers Republican 100%
WA U.S. House 8 Dave Reichert Republican 100%
WI U.S. House 1 Paul Ryan Republican 100%
WI U.S. House 3 Ron Kind Democratic 100%
WI U.S. House 5 Jim Sensenbrenner, Jr. Republican 100%
WI U.S. House 6 Tom Petri Republican 100%
WI U.S. House 7 Sean Duffy Republican 100%
WI U.S. House 8 Reid Ribble Republican 100%
WV U.S. House 1 David McKinley Republican 100%
WV U.S. House 2 Shelley Capito Republican 100%
WV U.S. House 3 Nick Rahall II Democratic 100%
WY U.S. House At-Large Cynthia Lummis Republican 100%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 100%
Donald Payne 100%
Mel Watt 0%
Bill Young 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top