Rating Group: NumbersUSA

2009-2013 Positions - Reduce Chain Migration (Feb 11, 2013)

Issues: Immigration
State Office Name Party Rating
AL U.S. House-4 Robert Aderholt R 100%
AL U.S. House-5 Mo Brooks R 100%
AR U.S. Senate-Sr John Boozman R 100%
AZ U.S. House-6 David Schweikert R 100%
CA U.S. House-39 Ed Royce R 100%
CA U.S. House-42 Ken Calvert R 100%
CA U.S. House-48 Dana Rohrabacher R 100%
CO U.S. House-5 Doug Lamborn R 100%
CO U.S. House-6 Michael Coffman R 100%
FL U.S. House-1 Jeff Miller R 100%
FL U.S. House-7 John Mica R 100%
FL U.S. House-11 Rich Nugent R 100%
FL U.S. House-12 Gus Bilirakis R 100%
FL U.S. House-15 Dennis Ross R 100%
GA U.S. House-3 Lynn Westmoreland R 100%
GA U.S. House-6 Tom Price R 100%
GA U.S. House-14 Tom Graves, Jr. R 100%
IA U.S. House-4 Steve King R 100%
ID U.S. House-1 Raúl Labrador R 100%
MN U.S. House-2 John Kline R 100%
MS U.S. House-3 Gregg Harper R 100%
MS U.S. House-4 Steven Palazzo R 100%
NC U.S. House-3 Walter Jones, Jr. R 100%
NC U.S. House-5 Virginia Foxx R 100%
NJ U.S. House-5 Scott Garrett R 100%
NV U.S. Senate-Jr Dean Heller R 100%
PA U.S. House-11 Lou Barletta R 100%
SC U.S. House-2 Joe Wilson, Sr. R 100%
SC U.S. House-3 Jeff Duncan R 100%
SC U.S. House-5 Mick Mulvaney R 100%
TN U.S. House-1 Phil Roe R 100%
TN U.S. House-4 Scott DesJarlais R 100%
TN U.S. House-6 Diane Black R 100%
TX U.S. House-1 Louie Gohmert R 100%
TX U.S. House-3 Sam Johnson R 100%
TX U.S. House-17 Bill Flores R 100%
TX U.S. House-24 Kenny Marchant R 100%
TX U.S. House-31 John Carter R 100%
UT U.S. House-3 Jason Chaffetz R 100%
VA U.S. House-1 Rob Wittman R 100%
VA U.S. House-4 Randy Forbes R 100%
VA U.S. House-6 Bob Goodlatte R 100%
WV U.S. House-1 David McKinley R 100%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Spencer Bachus 100%
Paul Broun 100%
Phil Gingrey 100%
Jack Kingston 100%
Gary Miller 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.