Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Advocacy Association

2011 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 33%
Sandy Adams 0%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 67%
Todd Akin 33%
Rodney Alexander 33%
Jason Altmire 67%
Rob Andrews 33%
Steve Austria 33%
Kelly Ayotte 33%
Joe Baca, Sr. 67%
Michele Bachmann 0%
Spencer Bachus 33%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 33%
John Barrow 67%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 33%
Max Baucus 33%
Mark Begich 33%
Dan Benishek 33%
Rick Berg 33%
Shelley Berkley 67%
Howard Berman 67%
Judy Biggert 33%
Brian Bilbray 33%
Jeff Bingaman 33%
Tim Bishop 67%
John Boehner 33%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 33%
Mary Bono Mack 33%
Dan Boren 67%
Leonard Boswell 67%
Charles Boustany, Jr. 33%
Barbara Boxer 33%
Bruce Braley 33%
Paul Broun 0%
Corrine Brown 67%
Scott Brown 33%
Ann Marie Buerkle 33%
Dan Burton 33%
Dave Camp 33%
John Campbell III 33%
Francisco Canseco 33%
Eric Cantor 33%
Lois Capps 33%
Dennis Cardoza 67%
Russ Carnahan 67%
John Carney, Jr. 67%
Saxby Chambliss 33%
Ben Chandler III 67%
Donna Christensen 100%
Hansen Clarke 100%
Dan Coats 33%
Howard Coble 33%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Kent Conrad 33%
Jerry Costello 67%
Chip Cravaack 0%
Ander Crenshaw 33%
Mark Critz 67%
Geoff Davis 33%
James DeMint 0%
Norm Dicks 67%
John Dingell 67%
Bob Dold 33%
David Dreier 33%
Donna Edwards 67%
Renee Ellmers 33%
Jo Ann Emerson 33%
John Ensign 0%
Eni Faleomavaega 33%
Sam Farr 33%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 67%
Bob Filner 100%
Stephen Fincher 33%
Mike Fitzpatrick 33%
John Fleming, Jr. 0%
Randy Forbes 0%
Barney Frank 67%
Elton Gallegly 33%
Scott Garrett 0%
Jim Gerlach 33%
Chris Gibson 33%
Gabrielle Giffords 33%
Phil Gingrey 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 67%
Michael Grimm 33%
Frank Guinta 33%
Kay Hagan 67%
Janice Hahn 33%
Ralph Hall 33%
Richard Hanna 33%
Tom Harkin 33%
Jane Harman 0%
Doc Hastings 33%
Nan Hayworth 33%
Michael Healy 0%
Joe Heck, Jr. 33%
Wally Herger, Jr. 33%
Maurice Hinchey 67%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 33%
Thomas Holden 67%
Rush Holt, Jr. 33%
Mike Honda 100%
Tim Huelskamp 0%
Robert Hurt 0%
Daniel Inouye 33%
Steve Israel 67%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
Mike Johanns 33%
Timothy Johnson 33%
Tim Johnson 0%
Dale Kildee 67%
Jack Kingston 0%
Mark Kirk 33%
Larry Kissell 67%
John Kline 33%
Herb Kohl 33%
Dennis Kucinich 67%
Jon Kyl 33%
Mary Landrieu 33%
Tom Latham 33%
Steve LaTourette 33%
Frank Lautenberg 67%
Carl Levin 0%
Jerry Lewis 33%
Joe Lieberman 67%
Dick Lugar 33%
Cynthia Lummis 33%
Dan Lungren 33%
Connie Mack IV 0%
Don Manzullo 33%
Jim Matheson 67%
Carolyn McCarthy 67%
Thaddeus McCotter 0%
Jim McDermott 67%
Mike McIntyre 67%
Buck McKeon 33%
John Mica 33%
Mike Michaud 67%
Barbara Mikulski 33%
Candice Miller 0%
Gary Miller 33%
George Miller 33%
Jeff Miller 33%
Brad Miller 33%
Jim Moran, Jr. 67%
Sue Myrick 33%
Ben Nelson 33%
Randy Neugebauer 0%
Rich Nugent 33%
Alan Nunnelee 33%
John Olver 67%
Bill Owens 67%
Ed Pastor 33%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 100%
Tom Petri 33%
Joe Pitts 33%
Todd Platts 33%
Mark Pryor 33%
Ben Quayle 33%
Nick Rahall II 67%
Charlie Rangel 100%
Denny Rehberg 0%
Harry Reid 33%
Silvestre Reyes 67%
Reid Ribble 33%
Laura Richardson 100%
Scott Rigell 0%
David Rivera 33%
Jay Rockefeller IV 33%
Mike Rogers 33%
Mike Ross 67%
Steve Rothman 67%
Jon Runyan 33%
Loretta Sanchez 33%
Bobby Schilling 33%
Jean Schmidt 0%
Aaron Schock 33%
Allyson Schwartz 67%
Heath Shuler 67%
Zane Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 67%
Steve Southerland 0%
Pete Stark 67%
Cliff Stearns 33%
Marlin Stutzman 0%
John Sullivan 33%
Betty Sutton 33%
Lee Terry 33%
John Tierney 33%
Ed Towns 100%
Bob Turner 0%
Mark Udall 33%
David Vitter 33%
Joe Walsh 0%
Mel Watt 67%
Henry Waxman 33%
Jim Webb, Jr. 33%
Anthony Weiner 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top