Rating Group: Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters

2001-2002 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 88%
WI U.S. House-4 Gwen Moore D 100%
WI Governor Scott Walker R 43%
WI State Assembly-1 Garey Bies R 50%
WI State Assembly-3 Alvin Ott R 50%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 100%
WI State Assembly-19 Jon Richards D 100%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 100%
WI State Assembly-27 Steven Kestell R 50%
WI State Assembly-33 Stephen Nass R 50%
WI State Assembly-55 Dean Kaufert R 43%
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 50%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 88%
WI State Senate-1 Frank Lasee R 43%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 100%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 100%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 50%
WI State Senate-9 Joseph Leibham R 50%
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 50%
WI State Senate-11 Neal Kedzie R 50%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 30%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 38%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 100%
WI State Senate-17 Dale Schultz R 60%
WI State Senate-19 Michael Ellis R 60%
WI State Senate-20 Glenn Grothman R 38%
WI State Senate-21 John Lehman D 100%
WI State Senate-22 Robert Wirch D 90%
WI State Senate-24 Julie Lassa D 88%
WI State Senate-25 Robert Jauch D 90%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 90%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 100%
WI State Senate-28 Mary Lazich R 50%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 50%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 100%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 75%
WI Supervisor-10 John Ainsworth 38%
WI Supervisor-13 Joe Plouff 100%
WI Public Service Commission Chair Phil Montgomery 50%
WI Railroad Commissioner Jeffrey Plale D 71%
Sheryl Albers 50%
Larry Balow 88%
James Baumgart 100%
Spencer Black 100%
Peter Bock 100%
Frank Boyle 100%
Roger Breske 70%
Brian Burke 100%
Charles Chvala 100%
G. Spencer Coggs 100%
Pedro Colon 88%
David Cullen 100%
Russell Decker 90%
Marc Duff 50%
Jeff Fitzgerald 50%
Steven Foti 50%
Stephen Freese 38%
Donald Friske 50%
John Gard 50%
Gary George 100%
Richard Grobschmidt 90%
Barbara Gronemus 63%
Scott Gunderson 50%
Mark Gundrum 50%
Eugene Hahn 50%
Tom Hebl 75%
J.A. Hines 100%
Timothy Hoven 50%
Gregory Huber 100%
Mary Hubler 75%
Michael Huebsch 50%
Joanne Huelsman 40%
Jean Hundertmark 50%
Scott Richard Jensen 57%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 43%
DuWayne Johnsrud 50%
Theodore Kanavas 33%
Judy Krawczyk 50%
Robin Kreibich 50%
James Kreuser 88%
Shirley Krug 88%
Margaret Krusick 100%
Bonnie Ladwig 33%
John La Fave 100%
Alan Lasee 30%
Michael Lehman 38%
MaryAnn Lippert 50%
Gabe Loeffelholz 50%
Terri McCormick 50%
Dan Meyer 50%
Mark Meyer 90%
Lee Meyerhofer 88%
Rodney Moen 90%
Johnnie Morris 100%
Terry Musser 50%
Carol Owens 50%
Mary Panzer 30%
Mark Pettis 50%
Kimberly Plache 100%
Michael Powers 50%
Martin Reynolds 75%
Kitty Rhoades 50%
Antonio Riley 75%
Judith Robson 100%
Carol Roessler 50%
Peggy Rosenzweig 56%
John Joseph Ryba 86%
Marlin Schneider 100%
Dan Schooff 75%
Lorraine Seratti 50%
Gary Sherman 88%
Kevin Shibilski 80%
Rick Skindrud 38%
Tony Staskunas 88%
John Steinbrink 88%
Jeffrey Stone 50%
Scott Suder 38%
Tom Sykora 50%
John Townsend 50%
David Travis 100%
Robert Turner 75%
Gregg Underheim 57%
Frank Urban 50%
Daniel Vrakas 50%
David Ward 50%
Sheldon Wasserman 100%
Robert Welch 30%
Steve Wieckert 50%
Annette Williams 88%
Wayne Wood 88%
Robert Ziegelbauer 63%
David Zien 40%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.