Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Journal

2002 Conservative on Social Policy Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 16%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 0%
Todd Akin 75%
Wayne Allard 62%
George Allen 62%
Thomas Allen 19%
Rob Andrews 26%
Joe Baca, Sr. 19%
Brian Baird 19%
Richard Hugh Baker 75%
Cass Ballenger 63%
Roscoe Bartlett 75%
Charlie Bass 44%
Max Baucus 33%
Evan Bayh 38%
Bob Bennett 62%
Douglas Bereuter 52%
Shelley Berkley 19%
Howard Berman 0%
Marion Berry 46%
Judy Biggert 42%
Michael Bilirakis 75%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Sherwood Boehlert 39%
Kit Bond 57%
Henry Bonilla 75%
Mary Bono Mack 51%
Leonard Boswell 42%
Rick Boucher 26%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 45%
John Breaux 44%
Henry Brown, Jr. 75%
Jim Bunning 62%
Conrad Burns 62%
Dan Burton 68%
Steve Buyer 62%
Robert Byrd 48%
Ben Campbell 62%
Chris Cannon 68%
Eric Cantor 75%
Brad Carson 42%
Julia Carson 16%
Mike Castle 42%
Hillary Clinton 0%
Michael Collins 75%
Larry Combest 75%
Kent Conrad 18%
Jon Corzine 0%
Jerry Costello 49%
Christopher Cox 68%
Larry Craig 62%
Robert Cramer 50%
Philip Crane 68%
Barbara Cubin 75%
Randall Cunningham 75%
Thomas Daschle 28%
James Davis 35%
Jo Ann Davis 75%
Thomas Davis III 57%
Bill Delahunt 16%
Thomas DeLay 75%
Peter Deutsch 27%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 70%
Norm Dicks 19%
Chris Dodd 28%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 62%
Calvin Dooley 19%
John Doolittle 75%
Byron Dorgan 38%
David Dreier 57%
Jennifer Dunn 57%
John Edwards 38%
Chet Edwards 39%
Vern Ehlers 52%
Jo Ann Emerson 68%
Philip English 63%
John Ensign 62%
Bob Etheridge 35%
Lane Evans 8%
Terry Everett 75%
Russ Feingold 0%
Michael Ferguson 53%
Bob Filner 3%
Peter Fitzgerald 62%
Mark Foley 53%
Harold Ford, Jr. 35%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 62%
Barney Frank 8%
William Frist 62%
Jonas Frost III 19%
Elton Gallegly 71%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 28%
Jim Gibbons 57%
Wayne Gilchrest 49%
Paul Gillmor 70%
Charlie Gonzalez 8%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 75%
Bart Gordon 42%
Porter Goss 63%
Daniel Graham 48%
Mark Green 71%
James Greenwood 37%
Judd Gregg 62%
Gilbert Gutknecht 71%
Jane Harman 29%
Melissa Hart 70%
Robert Hayes 75%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 75%
Joel Hefley 75%
Wally Herger, Jr. 75%
Baron Hill 37%
Maurice Hinchey 18%
David Lee Hobson 57%
Pete Hoekstra 61%
Thomas Holden 54%
Ernest Hollings 46%
Darlene Hooley 29%
John Nathan Hostettler 63%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 42%
Kenny Hulshof 71%
Duncan Hunter 75%
Kay Hutchison 62%
Henry Hyde 75%
Daniel Inouye 32%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 75%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 8%
William Jefferson 33%
James Merrill Jeffords 0%
William Lewis Jenkins 75%
Christopher John 51%
Nancy Johnson 39%
Tim Johnson 54%
Paul Kanjorski 46%
Ric Keller 75%
Sue Kelly 48%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Mark Kennedy 75%
Patrick Kennedy 34%
Dale Kildee 46%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 26%
Gerald Kleczka 35%
Joseph Knollenberg 62%
Herb Kohl 36%
James Kolbe 42%
Dennis Kucinich 35%
Jon Kyl 62%
Ray LaHood 63%
Nicholas Lampson 38%
Tom Lantos 19%
Steve LaTourette 56%
James Leach 45%
Jerry Lewis 63%
Ron Lewis 75%
Joe Lieberman 0%
Blanche Lincoln 46%
John Linder 75%
William Lipinski 52%
Trent Lott, Sr. 62%
Ken Lucas 75%
Dick Lugar 62%
Don Manzullo 75%
Robert Matsui 8%
Karen McCarthy 19%
James McCrery III 71%
John McHugh 75%
Scott McInnis 75%
Michael McNulty 41%
Martin Meehan 19%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 17%
Zell Bryan Miller 45%
Alan Mollohan 48%
Dennis Moore 29%
Jack Murtha 47%
Sue Myrick 75%
Ben Nelson 50%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 75%
Robert William Ney 75%
Don Nickles 62%
Anne Northup 54%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 75%
James Nussle 63%
Jim Oberstar 44%
Dave Obey 37%
John Olver 8%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 47%
Thomas William Osborne 63%
Doug Ose 49%
Major Owens 19%
Michael Oxley 75%
Ron Paul 51%
Donald Payne 3%
John Peterson 75%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 71%
Todd Platts 54%
Richard Pombo 75%
Earl Pomeroy 45%
Deborah Pryce 56%
Jack Quinn 53%
George Radanovich 71%
James Ramstad 53%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top