Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Journal

2001 Liberal on Economic Policy Score

Issues:
State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 93%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 71%
Todd Akin 7%
Wayne Allard 30%
George Allen 17%
Thomas Allen 91%
Rob Andrews 60%
Richard Armey 15%
Joe Baca, Sr. 74%
Brian Baird 66%
Richard Hugh Baker 7%
Cass Ballenger 20%
James Barcia 58%
Bob Barr, Jr. 7%
Roscoe Bartlett 28%
Charlie Bass 43%
Max Baucus 55%
Evan Bayh 61%
Bob Bennett 7%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 64%
Douglas Bereuter 43%
Shelley Berkley 62%
Howard Berman 91%
Marion Berry 57%
Judy Biggert 28%
Michael Bilirakis 43%
Jeff Bingaman 68%
Sherwood Boehlert 50%
Kit Bond 30%
Henry Bonilla 15%
David Edward Bonior 88%
Mary Bono Mack 7%
Robert Borski, Jr. 74%
Leonard Boswell 57%
Rick Boucher 62%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 57%
John Breaux 47%
Henry Brown, Jr. 22%
Ed Bryant 0%
Jim Bunning 7%
Conrad Burns 17%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 22%
Robert Byrd 64%
Herbert Callahan 21%
Ben Campbell 24%
Chris Cannon 7%
Eric Cantor 0%
Jean Carnahan 58%
Brad Carson 56%
Julia Carson 80%
Mike Castle 49%
Eva Clayton 95%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 61%
Robert Clement 54%
Hillary Clinton 87%
Michael Collins 33%
Larry Combest 7%
Gary Condit 54%
Kent Conrad 68%
John Cooksey 22%
Jon Corzine 93%
Jerry Costello 63%
Christopher Cox 0%
William Coyne 95%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 52%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 15%
Thomas Daschle 82%
James Davis 62%
Jo Ann Davis 32%
Thomas Davis III 41%
Bill Delahunt 95%
Thomas DeLay 0%
Peter Deutsch 77%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 33%
Norm Dicks 74%
Chris Dodd 88%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 41%
Calvin Dooley 53%
John Doolittle 7%
Byron Dorgan 67%
David Dreier 28%
Jennifer Dunn 36%
John Edwards 74%
Chet Edwards 63%
Vern Ehlers 39%
Jo Ann Emerson 46%
Philip English 46%
John Ensign 35%
Bob Etheridge 60%
Lane Evans 77%
Terry Everett 19%
Russ Feingold 79%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 95%
Peter Fitzgerald 44%
Mark Foley 36%
Harold Ford, Jr. 58%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 33%
Barney Frank 95%
William Frist 15%
Jonas Frost III 74%
Elton Gallegly 32%
John Ganske 51%
George Gekas 33%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 93%
Jim Gibbons 32%
Wayne Gilchrest 43%
Paul Gillmor 41%
Benjamin Gilman 51%
Charlie Gonzalez 70%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 12%
Bart Gordon 54%
Porter Goss 28%
Daniel Graham 74%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Mark Green 33%
James Greenwood 41%
Judd Gregg 35%
Felix Grucci, Jr. 41%
Gilbert Gutknecht 33%
Tony Hall 66%
James Hansen 0%
Jane Harman 57%
Melissa Hart 36%
Robert Hayes 15%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 7%
Joel Hefley 39%
Jesse Helms 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Baron Hill 64%
Van Hilleary 22%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 88%
Maurice Hinchey 95%
David Lee Hobson 28%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 70%
Pete Hoekstra 28%
Thomas Holden 63%
Ernest Hollings 66%
Darlene Hooley 62%
Stephen Horn 48%
John Nathan Hostettler 36%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 49%
Kenny Hulshof 28%
Duncan Hunter 7%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 17%
Kay Hutchison 26%
Henry Hyde 33%
Daniel Inouye 78%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 76%
William Jefferson 68%
James Merrill Jeffords 47%
William Lewis Jenkins 22%
Christopher John 52%
Nancy Johnson 49%
Tim Johnson 47%
Paul Kanjorski 74%
Ric Keller 27%
Sue Kelly 51%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 88%
Mark Kennedy 39%
Patrick Kennedy 70%
Brian Kerns 22%
Dale Kildee 80%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 91%
Gerald Kleczka 79%
Joseph Knollenberg 7%
Herb Kohl 64%
James Kolbe 15%
Dennis Kucinich 88%
Jon Kyl 7%
John LaFalce 80%
Ray LaHood 48%
Nicholas Lampson 66%
Tom Lantos 91%
Steve LaTourette 43%
James Leach 52%
Jerry Lewis 13%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 71%
Blanche Lincoln 54%
John Linder 15%
William Lipinski 55%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Dick Lugar 26%
William Luther 77%
James Maloney 58%
Don Manzullo 15%
Frank Mascara 67%
Robert Matsui 88%
Karen McCarthy 74%
James McCrery III 13%
John McHugh 45%
Scott McInnis 38%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 87%
Michael McNulty 95%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top