or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Radical Middle

2001-2002 Positions

Issues: Liberal
State Office District Name Party Rating
Charles Pickering, Jr. 20%
Todd Platts 25%
Richard Pombo 10%
Earl Pomeroy 30%
Deborah Pryce 15%
Jack Quinn 5%
George Radanovich 5%
James Ramstad 20%
Ralph Regula 0%
Denny Rehberg 25%
Silvestre Reyes 20%
Thomas Reynolds 5%
Ciro Rodriguez 30%
Mike Ross 25%
Steve Rothman 40%
Jim Ryun 10%
Martin Olav Sabo 20%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 20%
Rick Santorum 35%
Paul Sarbanes 35%
Jim Saxton 5%
Edward Schrock 10%
John Shadegg 5%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 20%
Christopher Shays 50%
Donald Sherwood 5%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 15%
Ike Skelton 10%
Gordon Smith 20%
Nick Smith 10%
Olympia Snowe 25%
Vic Snyder 35%
Hilda Solis 50%
Mark Souder 35%
Arlen Specter 15%
John Spratt, Jr. 15%
Pete Stark 55%
Cliff Stearns 5%
Charles Stenholm 20%
Ted Stevens 10%
Ted Strickland 15%
Bart Stupak 20%
John Sullivan 10%
John Sununu 10%
John Sweeney 15%
Tom Tancredo 30%
John Tanner 5%
Ellen Tauscher 25%
William Tauzin 15%
Charles Taylor 5%
Gene Taylor 10%
Craig Thomas 20%
William Thomas 10%
Todd Tiahrt 10%
Ed Towns 35%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 40%
James Turner 15%
George Voinovich 20%
James Walsh 15%
Zach Wamp 25%
John Warner 15%
Diane Watson 25%
Mel Watt 20%
Anthony Weiner 30%
David Weldon 15%
W. Curtis Weldon 10%
Gerald Weller 5%
Robert Wexler 40%
Heather Wilson 10%
Lynn Woolsey 60%
David Wu 35%
Albert Wynn 30%
Bill Young 5%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top