Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Association For Supervision and Curriculum Development

2007 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Rodney Alexander 25%
Wayne Allard 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Jason Altmire 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Michael Arcuri 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Michele Bachmann 0%
Spencer Bachus 25%
Brian Baird 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 0%
John Barrow 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 25%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Melissa Bean 75%
Bob Bennett 0%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 100%
Judy Biggert 50%
Brian Bilbray 25%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 100%
Kit Bond 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 25%
Mary Bono Mack 67%
Dan Boren 50%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 100%
Nancy Boyda 100%
Bruce Braley 100%
Paul Broun 0%
Henry Brown, Jr. 25%
Ginny Brown-Waite 25%
Jim Bunning 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 25%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 25%
John Campbell III 0%
Chris Cannon 25%
Eric Cantor 0%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Christopher Carney 100%
Mike Castle 75%
Saxby Chambliss 0%
Ben Chandler III 100%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 0%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jerry Costello 100%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 100%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Artur Davis 100%
David Davis 25%
Geoff Davis 25%
Lincoln Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 100%
James DeMint 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 25%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Elizabeth Dole 0%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 100%
Thelma Drake 25%
David Dreier 25%
Chet Edwards 100%
Vern Ehlers 75%
Brad Ellsworth 75%
Jo Ann Emerson 75%
Philip English 75%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Terry Everett 33%
Tom Feeney 0%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 100%
Bob Filner 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50%
Barney Frank 100%
Elton Gallegly 25%
Jim Gerlach 75%
Gabrielle Giffords 100%
Wayne Gilchrest 75%
Phil Gingrey 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 25%
Bart Gordon 100%
Judd Gregg 0%
Charles Hagel 0%
John Hall 100%
Ralph Hall 25%
Phil Hare 100%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
Doc Hastings 25%
Robert Hayes 50%
Wally Herger, Jr. 33%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 100%
Baron Hill 50%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 75%
Paul Hodes 100%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 100%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Kenny Hulshof 50%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 0%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
Tim Johnson 50%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Steve Kagen 100%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Ric Keller 50%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 25%
Ron Klein 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 25%
Herb Kohl 100%
Dennis Kucinich 75%
John Kuhl, Jr. 25%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 100%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Latham 75%
Steve LaTourette 75%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 25%
Ron Lewis 25%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 0%
Dick Lugar 100%
Dan Lungren 0%
Connie Mack IV 0%
Tim Mahoney 100%
Don Manzullo 0%
Jim Marshall 0%
Melquiades Martinez 0%
Jim Matheson 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 25%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 75%
Mike McIntyre 50%
Buck McKeon 33%
Michael McNulty 100%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 100%
Mike Michaud 100%
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 100%
Brad Miller 100%
Harry Mitchell 100%
Alan Mollohan 100%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 100%
Patrick Murphy 100%
Jack Murtha 100%
Marilyn Musgrave 25%
Sue Myrick 25%
Ben Nelson 100%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Ed Pastor 100%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 50%
Tom Petri 50%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 50%
Todd Platts 75%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Jon Porter, Sr. 75%
Deborah Pryce 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top