Rating Group: Humane Voters of Arizona

2009 Positions on Animal Protection

State Office Name Party Rating
AZ U.S. House-9 Kyrsten Sinema D 100%
AZ State House-7 Albert Hale D 100%
AZ State House-8 Frank Pratt R 67%
AZ State House-13 Steve Montenegro R 67%
AZ State House-14 David Gowan, Sr. R 17%
AZ State House-14 David Stevens R 25%
AZ State House-27 Rebecca Rios D 100%
AZ State House-28 Eric Meyer D 100%
AZ State House-30 Debbie McCune Davis D 100%
AZ State Senate-1 Steve Pierce R 17%
AZ State Senate-3 Olivia Cajero Bedford D 100%
AZ State Senate-4 Lynne Pancrazi D 75%
AZ State Senate-6 Sylvia Allen R 40%
AZ State Senate-8 Barbara McGuire D 67%
AZ State Senate-9 Steve Farley D 100%
AZ State Senate-10 Dave Bradley D 100%
AZ State Senate-12 Andy Biggs R 0%
AZ State Senate-15 Nancy Barto R 50%
AZ State Senate-17 Steven Yarbrough R 50%
AZ State Senate-21 Debbie Lesko R 67%
AZ State Senate-22 Judy Burges R 25%
AZ State Senate-23 John Kavanagh R 40%
AZ State Senate-28 Adam Driggs R 33%
AZ Secretary of State Michele Reagan R 67%
AZ Commissioner of Education Rich Crandall N/A 100%
AZ Mayor-At-Large Jay Tibshraeny N/A 75%
AZ Mayor-At-Large Jerry Weiers R 50%
AZ Council Member-2 Jim Waring 25%
Ed Ableser 100%
Paula Aboud 100%
Kirk Adams 50%
Amanda Aguirre 75%
Carolyn Allen 50%
Manny Alvarez 75%
Frank Antenori 40%
Cecil Ash 67%
Ray Barnes 67%
Tom Boone 67%
Jack Brown 75%
Robert Burns 25%
Meg Burton Cahill 100%
Chad Campbell 100%
Cloves Campbell, Jr. 100%
Tom Chabin 100%
Ken Cheuvront 67%
Steve Court 60%
Sam Crump 25%
Chris Deschene 100%
Pat Fleming 100%
Jorge Garcia 100%
Martha Garcia 100%
Doris Goodale 67%
Pamela Gorman 25%
Ron Gould 25%
Chuck Gray 25%
Linda Gray 50%
Jack Harper 0%
Matthew Heinz 100%
Laurin Hendrix 67%
John Huppenthal 50%
Russ Jones 60%
Bill Konopnicki 50%
Leah Landrum Taylor 100%
Barbara Leff 50%
Phil Lopes 100%
Linda Lopez 75%
David Lujan 100%
Lucy Mason 0%
John McComish 50%
Nancy McLain 67%
Al Melvin 60%
Ben Miranda 100%
Rick Murphy 33%
John Nelson 33%
Warde Nichols 50%
Jonathan Paton 71%
Daniel Patterson 100%
Russell Pearce 20%
David Schapira 100%
Carl Seel 33%
Andy Tobin, Sr. 40%
Anna Tovar 100%
Thayer Verschoor 25%
Rae Waters 100%
Jim Weiers 67%
Vic Williams 67%
Nancy Young Wright 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.