| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | State House | 10B | Darrell Bolz | Republican | 76% |
| ID | State House | 11A | Gayle Batt | Republican | 75% |
| ID | State House | 11B | Christy Perry | Republican | 76% |
| ID | State House | 13A | Brent Crane | Republican | 76% |
| ID | State House | 13B | Gary Collins | Republican | 76% |
| ID | State House | 14A | Mike Moyle | Republican | 76% |
| ID | State House | 14B | Reed DeMordaunt | Republican | 82% |
| ID | State House | 15A | Lynn Luker | Republican | 65% |
| ID | State House | 16A | Grant Burgoyne | Democratic | 75% |
| ID | State House | 17B | Susan Chew | Democratic | 82% |
| ID | State House | 18B | Phylis King | Democratic | 76% |
| ID | State House | 20A | Joe Palmer | Republican | 71% |
| ID | State House | 22A | John Vander Woude | Republican | 76% |
| ID | State Senate | 8 | Steven Thayn | Republican | 65% |
| ID | State Senate | 10 | Jim Rice | Republican | 100% |
| ID | State Senate | 11 | Patti Lodge | Republican | 100% |
| ID | State Senate | 13 | Curtis McKenzie | Republican | 100% |
| ID | State Senate | 14 | Marv Hagedorn | Republican | 71% |
| ID | State Senate | 16 | Leslie Bock | Democratic | 71% |
| ID | State Senate | 17 | Elliot Werk | Democratic | 82% |
| ID | State Senate | 19 | Cherie Buckner-Webb | Democratic | 87% |
| ID | State Senate | 20 | Chuck Winder | Republican | 100% |
| ID | State Senate | 21 | Clifford Bayer | Republican | 76% |
| ID | State Senate | 22 | Russell Fulcher | Republican | 100% |
| John Andreason | 100% | ||||
| Carlos Bilbao | 76% | ||||
| Max Black | 87% | ||||
| Brian Cronin | 71% | ||||
| Julie Ellsworth | 76% | ||||
| Elfreda Higgins | 93% | ||||
| William Killen | 82% | ||||
| Nicole LeFavour | 64% | ||||
| Shirley McKague | 86% | ||||
| Robert Schaefer, Sr. | 71% | ||||
| Melinda Smyser | 100% | ||||
| Mitch Toryanski | 100% |
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
