Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: St. Joseph Health System

2007-2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100
Gary Ackerman 100
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100
Todd Akin 0
Rodney Alexander 25
Jason Altmire 100
Rob Andrews 100
Michael Arcuri 100
Joe Baca, Sr. 100
Michele Bachmann 8
Spencer Bachus 25
Brian Baird 90
J. Gresham Barrett 0
John Barrow 91
Roscoe Bartlett 8
Max Baucus 80
Evan Bayh 100
Melissa Bean 63
Bob Bennett 0
Shelley Berkley 100
Howard Berman 100
Marion Berry 100
Judy Biggert 16
Brian Bilbray 16
Jeff Bingaman 100
Tim Bishop 100
Kit Bond 80
Jo Bonner, Jr. 25
Mary Bono Mack 54
Dan Boren 72
Leonard Boswell 100
Rick Boucher 100
Allen Boyd, Jr. 100
Bruce Braley 100
Paul Broun 0
Henry Brown, Jr. 25
Ginny Brown-Waite 27
Jim Bunning 40
Dan Burton 16
Steve Buyer 36
Robert Byrd 100
Dave Camp 25
John Campbell III 0
Eric Cantor 8
Dennis Cardoza 100
Russ Carnahan 100
Christopher Carney 100
Mike Castle 66
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 100
Ben Chandler III 100
Travis Childers 100
Hillary Clinton 100
Howard Coble 25
Thomas Coburn 33
Kent Conrad 80
Jerry Costello 100
Artur Davis 100
Geoff Davis 33
Lincoln Davis 100
Bill Delahunt 100
James DeMint 0
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 50
Norm Dicks 100
John Dingell 100
Chris Dodd 100
Byron Dorgan 100
David Dreier 16
Chet Edwards 100
Vern Ehlers 41
Brad Ellsworth 83
Jo Ann Emerson 75
John Ensign 20
Bob Etheridge 90
Russ Feingold 100
Bob Filner 100
Barney Frank 100
Elton Gallegly 25
Jim Gerlach 72
Gabrielle Giffords 91
Phil Gingrey 16
Charlie Gonzalez 100
Bart Gordon 100
Judd Gregg 0
John Hall 100
Ralph Hall 33
Phil Hare 100
Tom Harkin 100
Jane Harman 91
Doc Hastings 25
Wally Herger, Jr. 9
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 100
Baron Hill 83
Maurice Hinchey 100
Paul Hodes 100
Pete Hoekstra 25
Thomas Holden 100
Rush Holt, Jr. 100
Kay Hutchison 80
Bob Inglis, Sr. 8
Daniel Inouye 80
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100
Tim Johnson 50
Timothy Johnson 100
Steve Kagen 100
Paul Kanjorski 100
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100
Patrick Kennedy 100
Dale Kildee 100
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100
Jack Kingston 16
Ron Klein 100
Herb Kohl 100
Dennis Kucinich 81
Jon Kyl 0
Mary Landrieu 80
Tom Latham 50
Steve LaTourette 83
Frank Lautenberg 80
Carl Levin 100
Jerry Lewis 16
Joe Lieberman 80
Blanche Lincoln 80
John Linder 9
Dick Lugar 40
Dan Lungren 8
Connie Mack IV 9
Don Manzullo 16
Jim Marshall 75
Melquiades Martinez 60
Jim Matheson 75
Carolyn McCarthy 100
Thaddeus McCotter 41
John McHugh 83
Mike McIntyre 91
Buck McKeon 8
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 100
Mike Michaud 100
Gary Miller 40
George Miller 100
Brad Miller 100
Harry Mitchell 75
Alan Mollohan 100
Dennis Moore 100
Jim Moran, Jr. 91
Patrick Murphy 91
Jack Murtha 100
Sue Myrick 18
Ben Nelson 100
Jim Oberstar 100
Dave Obey 100
John Olver 100
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100
Ed Pastor 100
Ron Paul 0
Donald Payne 100
Tom Petri 41
Todd Platts 66
Earl Pomeroy 100
Mark Pryor 80
George Radanovich 16
Nick Rahall II 100
Denny Rehberg 58
Silvestre Reyes 100
Laura Richardson 100
Jay Rockefeller IV 80
Ciro Rodriguez 100
Mike Rogers 33
Mike Ross 100
Steve Rothman 100
John Salazar 100
Ken Salazar 80
Jean Schmidt 25
Allyson Schwartz 100
Joe Sestak, Jr. 100
John Shadegg 0
Carol Shea-Porter 100
Heath Shuler 91
Ike Skelton 100
Olympia Snowe 80
Vic Snyder 100
CA Supervisor 1 Hilda Solis 100
Mark Souder 45
Zack Space 100
Arlen Specter 100
John Spratt, Jr. 100
Pete Stark 83
Cliff Stearns 16
Bart Stupak 100
John Sullivan 16
Betty Sutton 100
John Tanner 100
Ellen Tauscher 100
Gene Taylor 91
Lee Terry 33
Todd Tiahrt 27
John Tierney 91
Ed Towns 100
Mark Udall 100
George Voinovich 0

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top