or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 75%
Brad Miller 50%
Alan Mollohan 25%
Dennis Moore 66%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 75%
Sue Myrick 75%
Ben Nelson 50%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 50%
John Olver 50%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 75%
Ron Paul 25%
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 75%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 75%
Todd Platts 75%
Earl Pomeroy 50%
Jon Porter, Sr. 75%
Deborah Pryce 75%
George Radanovich 75%
James Ramstad 75%
Ralph Regula 75%
Denny Rehberg 75%
Richard Renzi 75%
Silvestre Reyes 50%
Thomas Reynolds 75%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 75%
Ken Salazar 100%
Jim Saxton 75%
Jean Schmidt 75%
John Shadegg 75%
Christopher Shays 75%
Ike Skelton 100%
Gordon Smith 50%
Olympia Snowe 50%
Vic Snyder 50%
Hilda Solis 50%
Mark Souder 75%
Arlen Specter 50%
John Spratt, Jr. 50%
Pete Stark 50%
Cliff Stearns 75%
Ted Stevens 50%
Bart Stupak 75%
John Sullivan 75%
John Sununu 50%
Tom Tancredo 100%
John Tanner 50%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
Gene Taylor 50%
Craig Thomas 50%
Todd Tiahrt 100%
Ed Towns 75%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 50%
George Voinovich 100%
James Walsh 75%
Zach Wamp 50%
John Warner 50%
Diane Watson 50%
Mel Watt 50%
Anthony Weiner 50%
David Weldon 75%
Gerald Weller 75%
Robert Wexler 66%
Heather Wilson 75%
Lynn Woolsey 50%
David Wu 75%
Albert Wynn 75%
Bill Young 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top