Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 25%
Gary Ackerman 75%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 75%
Rodney Alexander 75%
Wayne Allard 50%
Thomas Allen 75%
Rob Andrews 50%
Joe Baca, Sr. 50%
Spencer Bachus 75%
Brian Baird 50%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
John Barrow 75%
Roscoe Bartlett 75%
Max Baucus 0%
Evan Bayh 100%
Melissa Bean 75%
Bob Bennett 50%
Shelley Berkley 50%
Howard Berman 50%
Marion Berry 50%
Judy Biggert 75%
Brian Bilbray 75%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 50%
Kit Bond 50%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 75%
Mary Bono Mack 75%
Dan Boren 75%
Leonard Boswell 50%
Rick Boucher 75%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 75%
Henry Brown, Jr. 75%
Ginny Brown-Waite 75%
Jim Bunning 50%
Dan Burton 75%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 75%
John Campbell III 75%
Chris Cannon 75%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 75%
Russ Carnahan 75%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 75%
Saxby Chambliss 50%
Ben Chandler III 50%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 100%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Norm Coleman 50%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jerry Costello 50%
Larry Craig 50%
Robert Cramer 75%
Barbara Cubin 50%
Artur Davis 75%
Geoff Davis 75%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Lincoln Davis 75%
Thomas Davis III 75%
Bill Delahunt 75%
James DeMint 50%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 75%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 75%
Chris Dodd 100%
Elizabeth Dole 50%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 50%
John Doolittle 75%
Byron Dorgan 100%
Thelma Drake 75%
David Dreier 75%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 75%
Jo Ann Emerson 75%
Philip English 75%
John Ensign 50%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Terry Everett 75%
Tom Feeney 100%
Russ Feingold 50%
Michael Ferguson 75%
Bob Filner 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 66%
Barney Frank 50%
Elton Gallegly 75%
Jim Gerlach 75%
Wayne Gilchrest 75%
Paul Gillmor 75%
Phil Gingrey 50%
Charlie Gonzalez 75%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 75%
Bart Gordon 66%
Judd Gregg 50%
Charles Hagel 50%
Ralph Hall 50%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 25%
Doc Hastings 75%
Robert Hayes 75%
Wally Herger, Jr. 75%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 75%
Maurice Hinchey 50%
David Lee Hobson 75%
Pete Hoekstra 75%
Thomas Holden 50%
Rush Holt, Jr. 50%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Kenny Hulshof 75%
Duncan Hunter 75%
Kay Hutchison 50%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 75%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 50%
Tim Johnson 75%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Ric Keller 75%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 50%
Dale Kildee 75%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 75%
Jack Kingston 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 75%
Herb Kohl 100%
Dennis Kucinich 50%
John Kuhl, Jr. 75%
Jon Kyl 50%
Ray LaHood 75%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Lantos 50%
Tom Latham 75%
Steve LaTourette 75%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 75%
Ron Lewis 75%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 50%
John Linder 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 50%
Dick Lugar 50%
Dan Lungren 75%
Connie Mack IV 100%
Don Manzullo 75%
Jim Marshall 75%
Melquiades Martinez 50%
Jim Matheson 75%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 75%
James McCrery III 75%
John McHugh 75%
Mike McIntyre 50%
Buck McKeon 75%
Michael McNulty 50%
Martin Meehan 0%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 75%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 75%
Mike Michaud 50%
Gary Miller 75%
George Miller 50%
Brad Miller 50%
Alan Mollohan 25%
Dennis Moore 66%
Jim Moran, Jr. 75%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 75%
Sue Myrick 75%
Ben Nelson 50%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 50%
John Olver 50%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 75%
Ed Pastor 50%
Ron Paul 25%
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 75%
Tom Petri 75%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 75%
Todd Platts 75%
Earl Pomeroy 50%
Jon Porter, Sr. 75%
Deborah Pryce 75%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 75%
Nick Rahall II 50%
James Ramstad 75%
Ralph Regula 75%
Denny Rehberg 75%
Richard Renzi 75%
Silvestre Reyes 50%
Thomas Reynolds 75%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Mike Rogers 75%
Mike Ross 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top