Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 7%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Spencer Bachus 8%
Brian Baird 82%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
Cass Ballenger 8%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 17%
Max Baucus 79%
Evan Bayh 93%
Bob Bennett 0%
Douglas Bereuter 8%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 83%
Judy Biggert 25%
Michael Bilirakis 8%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 25%
Kit Bond 0%
Henry Bonilla 17%
Mary Bono Mack 17%
Leonard Boswell 83%
Rick Boucher 92%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 67%
John Breaux 62%
Henry Brown, Jr. 8%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 20%
Robert Byrd 71%
Dave Camp 0%
Ben Campbell 15%
Chris Cannon 9%
Eric Cantor 0%
Brad Carson 83%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 25%
Lincoln Chafee 50%
Saxby Chambliss 8%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 0%
Michael Collins 8%
Larry Combest 0%
Kent Conrad 79%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 92%
Christopher Cox 8%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 45%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 18%
Thomas Daschle 93%
James Davis 92%
Jo Ann Davis 0%
Thomas Davis III 25%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 8%
James DeMint 0%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 25%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 86%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 8%
Calvin Dooley 91%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 79%
David Dreier 25%
Jennifer Dunn 17%
John Edwards 93%
Chet Edwards 83%
Vern Ehlers 25%
Jo Ann Emerson 9%
Philip English 17%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 92%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 8%
Russ Feingold 93%
Michael Ferguson 17%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 8%
Ernest Fletcher 17%
Mark Foley 25%
Harold Ford, Jr. 92%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 17%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 92%
Elton Gallegly 8%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 17%
Wayne Gilchrest 20%
Paul Gillmor 25%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
Bart Gordon 75%
Porter Goss 17%
Daniel Graham 93%
Mark Green 17%
James Greenwood 8%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Charles Hagel 7%
Ralph Hall 17%
Tom Harkin 93%
Jane Harman 100%
Melissa Hart 17%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 8%
Robert Hayes 8%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 8%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Baron Hill 91%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 17%
Joseph Hoeffel 100%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 92%
Ernest Hollings 93%
Rush Holt, Jr. 92%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 8%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 18%
Kenny Hulshof 8%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Kay Hutchison 7%
Henry Hyde 17%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 71%
William Lewis Jenkins 8%
Christopher John 67%
Nancy Johnson 33%
Tim Johnson 25%
Timothy Johnson 71%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Ric Keller 8%
Sue Kelly 25%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 8%
Patrick Kennedy 92%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 0%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 8%
Herb Kohl 93%
James Kolbe 25%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 17%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Mary Landrieu 85%
Tom Lantos 100%
Tom Latham 25%
Steve LaTourette 18%
James Leach 42%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 17%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 93%
John Linder 0%
William Lipinski 73%
Trent Lott, Sr. 7%
Ken Lucas 25%
Dick Lugar 0%
Don Manzullo 0%
Jim Matheson 83%
Robert Matsui 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Karen McCarthy 100%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 25%
CO Commissioner 2 Scott McInnis 0%
Mike McIntyre 75%
Buck McKeon 17%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 100%
Zell Bryan Miller 38%
Alan Mollohan 75%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 83%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top