Rating Group: The Mackinac - Sierra Club Michigan Chapter

1997-1998 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
MI U.S. House-7 Tim Walberg R 14%
MI U.S. House-8 Mike Rogers R 0%
MI State Senate-28 Mark Jansen R 14%
MI State Senate-31 Mike Green R 0%
MI Attorney General Bill Schuette R 0%
MI Director of the Office of the State Budget Robert Emerson D 100%
MI Commissioner-5 Ilona Varga Other 80%
MI Commissioner-7 Burton Leland Other 14%
MI Commissioner-9 Michael Hanley Other 71%
MI Commissioner-14 Joseph Palamara Other 71%
James Agee Other 57%
Tom Alley Other 17%
David Anthony Other 57%
Paul Timothy Baade Other 83%
Laura Baird Other 100%
Lyn Bankes Other 43%
Raymond Basham Other 67%
Loren Bennett Other 0%
Jim Berryman Other 100%
Patricia Birkholz Other 0%
William Bobier Other 29%
Beverly Bodem Other 14%
Rose Bogardus Other 100%
Mike Bouchard Other 0%
Robert Lincoln Brackenridge Other 25%
Elizabeth Brater Other 100%
Lingg Brewer Other 100%
Bob Brown Other 100%
Willis Bullard, Jr. Other 0%
William Byl Other 14%
Dianne Byrum Other 100%
William Callahan Other 80%
Nancy Cassis Other 14%
Deborah Cherry Other 71%
John Cherry, Jr. Other 100%
Nick Ciaramitaro Other 100%
Penny Crissman Other 50%
Alan Cropsey Other 14%
Candace Curtis Other 71%
Jessie Dalman Other 29%
Kenneth DeBeaussaert Other 100%
Dan DeGrow Other 0%
Eileen DeHart Other 86%
Larry DeVuyst Other 0%
Christopher Dingell Other 100%
Barbara Dobb Other 33%
Agnes Marie Dobronski Other 86%
Mat Dunaskiss Other 0%
Joanne Gregory Emmons Other 0%
Frank Moore Fitzgerald Other 17%
A. T. Frank Other 86%
John Freeman Other 100%
Patrick Gagliardi Other 71%
David Galloway Other 0%
Harry Gast Other 0%
R. Robert Geake Other 0%
Terry Geiger Other 0%
John Gernaat Other 0%
Donald Gilmer Other 17%
Sharon Gire Other 100%
Patricia A.K. Godchaux Other 14%
Michael Goschka Other 57%
Joel Gougeon Other 67%
Michael Griffin Other 75%
David Gubow Other 100%
Dan Gustafson Other 0%
Derrick Hale Other 71%
Beverly Hammerstrom Other 29%
Clark Harder Other 86%
George Zaven Hart Other 100%
Curtis Hertel Other 80%
Philip Edward Hoffman Other 100%
Morris Hood, Jr. Other 71%
Jack Horton Other 0%
David Jaye Other 100%
Ron Jelinek Other 0%
Jon Jellema Other 43%
R. Shirley Johnson Other 33%
Shirley Johnson Other 33%
Gregory John Kaza Other 67%
Thomas Kelly Other 100%
Kwame Kilpatrick Other 50%
Don Koivisto Other 100%
Alvin Kukuk Other 43%
Edward LaForge Other 71%
Gerald Law Other 29%
Clyde LeTarte Other 14%
John Llewellyn Other 29%
Terry London Other 50%
Allen Lowe Other 29%
George Mans Other 80%
Lynne Martinez Other 100%
Thomas Mathieu Other 40%
Jim McBryde Other 29%
George McManus, Jr. Other 0%
Michelle McManus Other 14%
James Roger McNutt Other 0%
James Mick Middaugh Other 0%
Thomas Middleton Other 17%
Arthur Miller, Jr. Other 100%
Raymond Murphy Other 67%
Walter North Other 0%
Michael Nye Other 43%
Michael O'Brien Other 0%
Dennis Olshove Other 80%
Lynn Owen Other 67%
Glenn Oxender Other 20%
Mary Lou Parks Other 100%
Charles Perricone Other 0%
Dick Posthumus Other 0%
Hubert Price, Jr. Other 71%
Kirk Profit Other 100%
Michael Prusi Other 57%
Nancy Quarles Other 100%
Ray Raczkowski Other 0%
Kim Alan Rhead Other 20%
Andrew Richner Other 14%
Vera Rison Other 100%
Sue Rocca Other 43%
Alan Sanborn Other 40%
Mark Schauer Other 86%
Gloria Schermesser Other 50%
Mary Schroer Other 100%
John Schwarz Other 0%
Martha Scott Other 100%
Judith Scranton Other 14%
Dale Shugars Other 0%
Kenneth Sikkema Other 0%
Alma Smith Other 100%
Virgil Clark Smith, Jr. Other 0%
Keith Stallworth Other 100%
Glenn Steil, Jr. Other 0%
Leon Stille Other 0%
Paul Tesanovich Other 57%
Samuel Thomas III Other 67%
William VanRegenmorter Other 0%
Edward Vaughn Other 100%
Jackie Vaughn III Other 0%
Harold Voorhees Other 29%
Ted Wallace Other 100%
Howard Wetters Other 80%
Deborah Whyman Other 33%
Karen Willard Other 100%
Paul Wojno Other 71%
Joseph Young, Jr. Other 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.