Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Association of University Women

1999 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Steve Buyer 0%
Robert Byrd 75%
Herbert Callahan 0%
Dave Camp 0%
Ben Campbell 0%
Thomas Campbell 66%
Chris Cannon 0%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 66%
Linc Chafee 100%
Saxby Chambliss 0%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 0%
William Clay, Sr. 100%
Eva Clayton 100%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 100%
Robert Clement 100%
Howard Coble 0%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Michael Collins 0%
Larry Combest 0%
Gary Condit 83%
Kent Conrad 75%
Merrill Cook 50%
John Cooksey 33%
Jerry Costello 50%
Paul Coverdell 0%
Christopher Cox 16%
William Coyne 100%
Larry Craig 12%
Robert Cramer 100%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Patsy Ann Danner 66%
Thomas Daschle 87%
James Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 33%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 0%
James DeMint 0%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 16%
Jay Dickey 16%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Julian Dixon 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 100%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 87%
David Dreier 16%
Jennifer Dunn 33%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 100%
Vern Ehlers 16%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 66%
Jo Ann Emerson 16%
Philip English 33%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Thomas Ewing 16%
Russ Feingold 100%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 12%
Ernest Fletcher 16%
Mark Foley 83%
Michael Patrick Forbes 33%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 0%
Tillie Fowler 66%
Barney Frank 100%
Robert Franks 83%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 83%
Elton Gallegly 33%
John Ganske 50%
Sam Gejdenson 100%
George Gekas 0%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 50%
Wayne Gilchrest 50%
Paul Gillmor 16%
Benjamin Gilman 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
William Goodling 0%
Bart Gordon 83%
Slade Gorton 25%
Porter Goss 0%
Daniel Graham 100%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Rodney Grams 0%
Mark Green 16%
James Greenwood 66%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Charles Hagel 0%
Ralph Hall 33%
Tony Hall 33%
James Hansen 0%
Tom Harkin 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 0%
Robert Hayes 0%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 16%
Joel Hefley 0%
Jesse Helms 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Baron Hill 100%
Rick Hill 16%
Van Hilleary 16%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 66%
David Lee Hobson 50%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 50%
Ernest Hollings 87%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Stephen Horn 83%
John Nathan Hostettler 16%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 66%
Kenny Hulshof 16%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Asa Hutchinson 16%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 0%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 0%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 50%
James Merrill Jeffords 37%
William Lewis Jenkins 16%
Christopher John 50%
Nancy Johnson 83%
Timothy Johnson 87%
Paul Kanjorski 83%
Sue Kelly 66%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 83%
Bob Kerrey 100%
Dale Kildee 50%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 0%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Ronald Klink 83%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 50%
Dennis Kucinich 50%
Steven Kuykendall 66%
Jon Kyl 0%
John LaFalce 50%
Ray LaHood 16%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Mary Landrieu 87%
Tom Lantos 100%
Stephen Largent 0%
Tom Latham 0%
Steve LaTourette 50%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Rick Lazio 50%
James Leach 66%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 16%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 87%
Blanche Lincoln 87%
John Linder 0%
William Lipinski 16%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Ken Lucas 33%
Dick Lugar 0%
William Luther 83%
Connie Mack 0%
James Maloney 100%
Don Manzullo 0%
Matthew Martinez 100%
Frank Mascara 33%
Robert Matsui 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 66%
Karen McCarthy 83%
Bill McCollum 33%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 33%
David McIntosh 16%
Mike McIntyre 50%
Buck McKeon 0%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 66%
Martin Meehan 83%
Carrie Meek 100%
Jack Metcalf 0%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Dan Miller 50%
Gary Miller 16%
George Miller 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top