Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Association of University Women

2007 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100
Gary Ackerman 100
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100
Todd Akin 16
Rodney Alexander 33
Wayne Allard 0
Thomas Allen 100
Jason Altmire 100
Rob Andrews 100
Michael Arcuri 100
Joe Baca, Sr. 100
Michele Bachmann 0
Spencer Bachus 16
Brian Baird 100
J. Gresham Barrett 0
John Barrow 100
Roscoe Bartlett 16
Max Baucus 83
Evan Bayh 100
Melissa Bean 100
Bob Bennett 50
Shelley Berkley 100
Howard Berman 100
Marion Berry 83
Judy Biggert 83
Brian Bilbray 16
Jeff Bingaman 100
Tim Bishop 100
Kit Bond 16
Jo Bonner, Jr. 33
Mary Bono Mack 66
Dan Boren 50
Leonard Boswell 100
Rick Boucher 100
Allen Boyd, Jr. 50
Nancy Boyda 83
Bruce Braley 100
Paul Broun 0
Henry Brown, Jr. 33
Ginny Brown-Waite 66
Jim Bunning 16
Dan Burton 16
Steve Buyer 16
Robert Byrd 83
Dave Camp 33
John Campbell III 0
Chris Cannon 16
Eric Cantor 0
Dennis Cardoza 100
Russ Carnahan 100
Christopher Carney 83
Mike Castle 83
Saxby Chambliss 33
Ben Chandler III 100
Hillary Clinton 66
Howard Coble 16
Thomas Coburn 0
Norm Coleman 83
Kent Conrad 83
Jerry Costello 83
Larry Craig 33
Robert Cramer 66
Barbara Cubin 0
Artur Davis 100
David Davis 16
Geoff Davis 33
Lincoln Davis 66
Thomas Davis III 50
Bill Delahunt 100
James DeMint 0
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 66
Norm Dicks 66
John Dingell 100
Chris Dodd 66
Elizabeth Dole 33
Pete Domenici, Jr. 33
John Doolittle 0
Byron Dorgan 83
David Dreier 16
Chet Edwards 100
Vern Ehlers 33
Brad Ellsworth 50
Jo Ann Emerson 50
Philip English 66
John Ensign 33
Bob Etheridge 100
Terry Everett 50
Tom Feeney 0
Russ Feingold 100
Michael Ferguson 66
Bob Filner 83
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50
Barney Frank 100
Elton Gallegly 16
Jim Gerlach 83
Gabrielle Giffords 100
Wayne Gilchrest 83
Phil Gingrey 16
Charlie Gonzalez 100
Virgil Goode, Jr. 33
Bart Gordon 83
Judd Gregg 16
Charles Hagel 33
John Hall 100
Ralph Hall 16
Phil Hare 100
Tom Harkin 100
Jane Harman 83
Doc Hastings 16
Robert Hayes 50
Wally Herger, Jr. 0
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 100
Baron Hill 83
Maurice Hinchey 100
David Lee Hobson 50
Paul Hodes 100
Pete Hoekstra 16
Thomas Holden 83
Rush Holt, Jr. 100
Darlene Hooley 83
Kenny Hulshof 33
Duncan Hunter 16
Kay Hutchison 50
Bob Inglis, Sr. 33
Daniel Inouye 100
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100
William Jefferson 100
Tim Johnson 50
Timothy Johnson 66
Steve Kagen 100
Paul Kanjorski 100
Ric Keller 50
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 83
Patrick Kennedy 100
Dale Kildee 100
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100
Jack Kingston 0
Ron Klein 100
Joseph Knollenberg 33
Herb Kohl 100
Dennis Kucinich 83
John Kuhl, Jr. 66
Jon Kyl 16
Ray LaHood 66
Nicholas Lampson 66
Mary Landrieu 83
Tom Latham 33
Steve LaTourette 50
Frank Lautenberg 100
Carl Levin 100
Jerry Lewis 33
Ron Lewis 16
Joe Lieberman 100
Blanche Lincoln 66
John Linder 0
Dick Lugar 66
Dan Lungren 16
Connie Mack IV 0
Tim Mahoney 83
Don Manzullo 0
Jim Marshall 83
Melquiades Martinez 50
Jim Matheson 100
Carolyn McCarthy 100
Thaddeus McCotter 50
James McCrery III 33
John McHugh 50
Mike McIntyre 66
Buck McKeon 16
Michael McNulty 100
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 66
Mike Michaud 100
Gary Miller 16
George Miller 83
Brad Miller 100
Harry Mitchell 100
Alan Mollohan 83
Dennis Moore 100
Jim Moran, Jr. 100
Patrick Murphy 100
Jack Murtha 100
Marilyn Musgrave 0
Sue Myrick 0
Ben Nelson 83
Jim Oberstar 100
Dave Obey 100
John Olver 100
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 66
Ed Pastor 100
Ron Paul 0
Donald Payne 100
John Peterson 50
Tom Petri 50
Charles Pickering, Jr. 16
Todd Platts 66
Earl Pomeroy 100
Jon Porter, Sr. 50
Deborah Pryce 83
Mark Pryor 83

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top