Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Association of University Women

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 90%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 30%
Rodney Alexander 30%
Wayne Allard 10%
George Allen 10%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Spencer Bachus 33%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 14%
J. Gresham Barrett 30%
John Barrow 70%
Roscoe Bartlett 10%
Charlie Bass 60%
Max Baucus 78%
Evan Bayh 100%
Melissa Bean 90%
Bob Beauprez 33%
Bob Bennett 10%
Shelley Berkley 89%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 60%
Judy Biggert 60%
Brian Bilbray 33%
Michael Bilirakis 33%
Jeff Bingaman 80%
Tim Bishop 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 67%
Kit Bond 10%
Henry Bonilla 40%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 20%
Mary Bono Mack 60%
Dan Boren 40%
Leonard Boswell 89%
Rick Boucher 80%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 80%
Henry Brown, Jr. 33%
Ginny Brown-Waite 30%
Jim Bunning 10%
Conrad Burns 10%
Dan Burton 20%
Steve Buyer 50%
Robert Byrd 50%
Dave Camp 33%
John Campbell III 20%
Chris Cannon 30%
Eric Cantor 40%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Julia Carson 100%
Edward Case 80%
Mike Castle 60%
Linc Chafee 80%
Saxby Chambliss 10%
Ben Chandler III 70%
Chris Chocola 30%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 33%
Thomas Coburn 10%
Norm Coleman 30%
Kent Conrad 60%
Jerry Costello 78%
Larry Craig 10%
Robert Cramer 70%
Barbara Cubin 30%
Artur Davis 90%
Geoff Davis 30%
James Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 29%
Lincoln Davis 50%
Thomas Davis III 30%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 33%
James DeMint 10%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 44%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 78%
Elizabeth Dole 10%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 10%
John Doolittle 20%
Byron Dorgan 80%
Thelma Drake 30%
David Dreier 33%
Chet Edwards 80%
Vern Ehlers 30%
Jo Ann Emerson 25%
Philip English 30%
John Ensign 10%
Bob Etheridge 90%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 20%
Tom Feeney 40%
Russ Feingold 90%
Michael Ferguson 30%
Bob Filner 100%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 78%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 30%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 20%
Elton Gallegly 30%
Jim Gerlach 50%
Jim Gibbons 30%
Wayne Gilchrest 63%
Paul Gillmor 30%
Phil Gingrey 20%
Charlie Gonzalez 90%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 30%
Bart Gordon 80%
Mark Green 30%
Judd Gregg 20%
Gilbert Gutknecht 30%
Charles Hagel 11%
Ralph Hall 30%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
Katherine Harris 30%
Melissa Hart 30%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 38%
Robert Hayes 30%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 30%
Joel Hefley 33%
Wally Herger, Jr. 20%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 80%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 40%
Pete Hoekstra 25%
Thomas Holden 80%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 44%
Kenny Hulshof 30%
Duncan Hunter 30%
Kay Hutchison 10%
Henry Hyde 33%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 30%
Daniel Inouye 90%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 38%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 80%
James Merrill Jeffords 89%
William Lewis Jenkins 30%
Nancy Johnson 80%
Tim Johnson 40%
Timothy Johnson 80%
Paul Kanjorski 90%
Ric Keller 30%
Sue Kelly 60%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 30%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 90%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 40%
Joseph Knollenberg 40%
Herb Kohl 80%
James Kolbe 67%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
John Kuhl, Jr. 30%
Jon Kyl 10%
Ray LaHood 40%
Mary Landrieu 90%
Tom Lantos 100%
Tom Latham 30%
Steve LaTourette 40%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
James Leach 90%
Carl Levin 80%
Jerry Lewis 30%
Ron Lewis 30%
Joe Lieberman 78%
Blanche Lincoln 80%
John Linder 22%
Trent Lott, Sr. 10%
Dick Lugar 10%
Dan Lungren 30%
Connie Mack IV 40%
Don Manzullo 30%
Jim Marshall 60%
Melquiades Martinez 10%
Jim Matheson 80%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 40%
James McCrery III 30%
John McHugh 40%
Mike McIntyre 60%
Buck McKeon 30%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 88%
Martin Meehan 100%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 50%
Mike Michaud 90%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Gary Miller 22%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top