Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Association of University Women

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Richard Armey 0%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
Cass Ballenger 0%
James Barcia 86%
Bob Barr, Jr. 0%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 29%
Max Baucus 83%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Bennett 0%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 100%
Douglas Bereuter 29%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 86%
Judy Biggert 43%
Michael Bilirakis 14%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Rod Blagojevich 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 43%
Kit Bond 17%
Henry Bonilla 0%
David Edward Bonior 100%
Mary Bono Mack 14%
Robert Borski, Jr. 86%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 100%
John Breaux 50%
Henry Brown, Jr. 0%
Ed Bryant 0%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 17%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 0%
Robert Byrd 50%
Herbert Callahan 0%
Ben Campbell 0%
Chris Cannon 0%
Eric Cantor 0%
Jean Carnahan 83%
Brad Carson 100%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 43%
Eva Clayton 100%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 83%
Robert Clement 86%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Michael Collins 0%
Larry Combest 0%
Gary Condit 71%
Kent Conrad 67%
John Cooksey 0%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 86%
Christopher Cox 0%
William Coyne 100%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 57%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 0%
Thomas Davis III 29%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 0%
James DeMint 0%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Norm Dicks 100%
Chris Dodd 83%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 100%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 67%
David Dreier 0%
Jennifer Dunn 14%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 100%
Vern Ehlers 0%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 14%
Jo Ann Emerson 29%
Philip English 14%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Russ Feingold 83%
Michael Ferguson 14%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 17%
Ernest Fletcher 0%
Mark Foley 14%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 0%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 100%
Elton Gallegly 0%
John Ganske 29%
George Gekas 29%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 14%
Wayne Gilchrest 29%
Paul Gillmor 14%
Benjamin Gilman 43%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
Bart Gordon 86%
Porter Goss 0%
Daniel Graham 100%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Mark Green 0%
James Greenwood 14%
Judd Gregg 0%
Felix Grucci, Jr. 14%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Tony Hall 71%
James Hansen 0%
Jane Harman 100%
Melissa Hart 0%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Robert Hayes 0%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 14%
Jesse Helms 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Baron Hill 100%
Van Hilleary 0%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 14%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 100%
Pete Hoekstra 14%
Thomas Holden 86%
Ernest Hollings 83%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Stephen Horn 43%
John Nathan Hostettler 29%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 43%
Kenny Hulshof 29%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 0%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 0%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 67%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Christopher John 67%
Nancy Johnson 43%
Tim Johnson 29%
Paul Kanjorski 86%
Ric Keller 0%
Sue Kelly 29%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 14%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Brian Kerns 0%
Dale Kildee 86%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 14%
Dennis Kucinich 86%
Jon Kyl 0%
John LaFalce 71%
Ray LaHood 29%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Tom Lantos 100%
Steve LaTourette 14%
James Leach 57%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 83%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 0%
William Lipinski 33%
Trent Lott, Sr. 20%
Ken Lucas 29%
Dick Lugar 0%
William Luther 100%
James Maloney 100%
Don Manzullo 14%
Frank Mascara 86%
Robert Matsui 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top