Rating Group: AACF-Kids Count-Revenue Issues

2003 Revenue Issues Score

Issues: Budget, Spending and Taxes , Marriage, Family, and Children
How to Interpret these Evaluations
State Office Name Party Rating
AR State House-17 Henry Wilkins IV D 80%
AR State House-76 Denny Altes R 0%
AR State Senate-3 Cecile Bledsoe R 17%
AR State Senate-16 Michael Lamoureux R 83%
AR State Senate-17 Johnny Key R 0%
AR State Senate-21 Paul Bookout D 83%
AR State Senate-30 Linda Chesterfield D 83%
AR State Senate-31 Joyce Elliott D 100%
AR State Senate-33 Jeremy Hutchinson R 17%
AR Insurance Commissioner Jay Bradford D 83%
AR County Judge-At-Large Preston Scroggin Other 50%
Bob Adams Other 33%
Sarah Agee Other 50%
Keven Anderson Other 33%
James Argue, Jr. Other 100%
Gilbert Baker Other 60%
Russell Bennett Other 17%
Stan Berry Other 67%
Gary Biggs Other 83%
David Bisbee Other 80%
Buddy Blair Other 83%
Johnnie Bolin Other 67%
Will Bond Other 67%
Jerry Bookout Other 100%
Shirley Borhauer Other 83%
Travis Boyd Other 83%
Stephen Bright Other 50%
Shane Broadway Other 100%
Irma Brown Other 80%
Steve Bryles Other 100%
John Paul Capps Other 80%
Marvin Childers Other 33%
Booker Clemons Other 50%
Herschel Cleveland Other 67%
Kenneth Wayne Cowling Other 83%
Mike Creekmore Other 50%
Jack Critcher Other 80%
Leroy Dangeau Other 83%
Joyce Dees Other 67%
Tommy Dickinson Other 83%
Roosevelt Dwayne Dobbins Other 83%
John Eason Other 67%
Marilyn Edwards Other 100%
A. David Evans Other 83%
Lenville Evans, Sr. Other 67%
Steve Faris Other 80%
Danny Ferguson Other 83%
Dwight Fite Other 83%
Jeff Gillespie Other 50%
Billy Gipson Other 100%
Bobby Glover Other 80%
Kevin Goss Other 83%
Mary Beth Green Other 50%
Brenda Gullett Other 80%
David Haak Other 50%
Horace Hardwick Other 50%
Eric Harris Other 17%
Mike Hathorn Other 83%
Kim Hendren Other 80%
Boyd Hickinbotham Other 83%
Stephen W. Higginbothom, Sr. Other 100%
Jim Hill Other 100%
Jim Holt Other 20%
Barbara Horn Other 100%
Don House Other 83%
Phillip Jackson Other 83%
Phillip Truman Jacobs Other 67%
Gene Jeffress Other 80%
Jimmy Jeffress Other 80%
Robert Jeffrey Other 67%
Bob Johnson Other 80%
Calvin Johnson Other 83%
Janet Johnson Other 83%
Steven Jones Other 100%
Janice Ann Judy Other 100%
Mike Kenney Other 50%
Barbara Jean King Other 83%
Randy Laverty Other 80%
Sam Ledbetter Other 100%
Jim Lendall Other 100%
John Lewellen Other 100%
James Luker Other 100%
Dewayne Mack Other 83%
Sue Madison Other 100%
Jodie Mahony Other 100%
W. Percy Malone Other 100%
Jay Martin Other 67%
Douglas Matayo Other 0%
Bob Mathis Other 50%
Jim Medley Other 67%
Paul Miller Other 100%
Jimmy Milligan Other 83%
Thomas Moore Other 67%
Steve Napper Other 50%
William Wayne Nichols Other 67%
James Norton Other 33%
James Oglesby Other 67%
Charles Ormond Other 50%
Daryl Pace Other 33%
Marvin Parks Other 17%
Mark Pate Other 100%
Kevin Penix Other 17%
Benny Petrus Other 50%
Betty Pickett Other 67%
Larry Prater Other 100%
Sandra Prater Other 67%
Bill Pritchard Other 83%
Randy Morton Rankin Other 83%
Tommy Roebuck Other 83%
Sid Rosenbaum Other 17%
Mary Salmon Other 100%
Susan Schulte Other 33%
Bill Scrimshire Other 83%
Harmon Seawel Other 100%
M. Roger Smith Other 83%
William Smith Other 80%
Tracy Steele Other 100%
Bill Stovall III Other 67%
Scott Sullivan Other 83%
Denny Sumpter Other 67%
Chaney Taylor, Jr. Other 33%
Jerry Taylor Other 33%
Lindbergh Howard Thomas Other 100%
Chris Thomason Other 83%
Chris Thyer Other 67%
Sharon Trusty Other 80%
John Paul Verkamp Other 33%
Shirley Walters Other 67%
Paul Weaver Other 50%
Ruth Whitaker Other 80%
Robert White Other 83%
James Wilkinson Other 100%
Shawn Womack Other 20%
Jeff Wood Other 50%
Tim Wooldridge Other 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.