Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The John Birch Society

2009-2010 Positions (Full Session)

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 0%
John Adler 23%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 3%
Todd Akin 86%
Rodney Alexander 79%
Jason Altmire 20%
Rob Andrews 3%
Michael Arcuri 15%
Steve Austria 73%
Joe Baca, Sr. 3%
Michele Bachmann 88%
Spencer Bachus 79%
Brian Baird 23%
J. Gresham Barrett 90%
John Barrow 23%
Roscoe Bartlett 88%
Max Baucus 8%
Evan Bayh 37%
Melissa Bean 8%
Mark Begich 8%
Bob Bennett 73%
Shelley Berkley 5%
Howard Berman 5%
Marion Berry 21%
Judy Biggert 68%
Brian Bilbray 69%
Jeff Bingaman 3%
Tim Bishop 0%
John Boccieri 10%
Kit Bond 63%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 80%
Mary Bono Mack 67%
Dan Boren 34%
Leonard Boswell 0%
Rick Boucher 19%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 18%
Bruce Braley 5%
Bobby Bright 51%
Paul Broun 92%
Henry Brown, Jr. 89%
Scott Brown 69%
Ginny Brown-Waite 74%
Jim Bunning 94%
Roland Burris 0%
Dan Burton 80%
Steve Buyer 84%
Dave Camp 82%
John Campbell III 89%
Eric Cantor 85%
Joseph Cao 30%
Dennis Cardoza 5%
Russ Carnahan 0%
Christopher Carney 11%
Mike Castle 45%
Saxby Chambliss 89%
Ben Chandler III 20%
Travis Childers 38%
Howard Coble 83%
Thomas Coburn 97%
Kent Conrad 5%
Jerry Costello 18%
Mark Critz 30%
Kathy Dahlkemper 13%
Artur Davis 17%
Geoff Davis 85%
Lincoln Davis 26%
Bill Delahunt 8%
James DeMint 98%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 62%
Norm Dicks 0%
John Dingell 5%
Charles Djou 67%
Chris Dodd 3%
Byron Dorgan 13%
David Dreier 80%
Steve Driehaus 13%
Chet Edwards 20%
Vern Ehlers 67%
Brad Ellsworth 15%
Jo Ann Emerson 73%
John Ensign 97%
Bob Etheridge 3%
Russ Feingold 33%
Bob Filner 20%
Barney Frank 10%
Elton Gallegly 85%
Jim Gerlach 52%
Gabrielle Giffords 13%
Phil Gingrey 86%
Charlie Gonzalez 3%
Carte Goodwin 0%
Bart Gordon 8%
Judd Gregg 65%
Parker Griffith, Jr. 58%
Kay Hagan 3%
John Hall 3%
Ralph Hall 79%
Debbie Halvorson 5%
Phil Hare 8%
Tom Harkin 5%
Jane Harman 5%
Doc Hastings 85%
Wally Herger, Jr. 85%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 33%
Baron Hill 25%
Maurice Hinchey 8%
Paul Hodes 13%
Pete Hoekstra 79%
Thomas Holden 18%
Rush Holt, Jr. 8%
Kay Hutchison 81%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 85%
Daniel Inouye 3%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 8%
Mike Johanns 77%
Timothy Johnson 3%
Tim Johnson 85%
Steve Kagen 15%
Paul Kanjorski 5%
Ted Kaufman 8%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 3%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 8%
Mary Jo Kilroy 5%
Jack Kingston 83%
Larry Kissell 15%
Ron Klein 0%
Herb Kohl 3%
Suzanne Kosmas 13%
Frank Kratovil, Jr. 28%
Dennis Kucinich 40%
Jon Kyl 85%
Mary Landrieu 5%
Tom Latham 75%
Steve LaTourette 56%
Frank Lautenberg 3%
Chris Lee 62%
George LeMieux 88%
Carl Levin 3%
Jerry Lewis 85%
Joe Lieberman 3%
Blanche Lincoln 23%
John Linder 91%
Dick Lugar 58%
Dan Lungren 85%
Connie Mack IV 89%
Dan Maffei 15%
Don Manzullo 83%
Betsy Markey 15%
Jim Marshall 40%
Jim Matheson 40%
Carolyn McCarthy 3%
Thaddeus McCotter 70%
Mike McIntyre 40%
Buck McKeon 83%
Michael McMahon 13%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 5%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 26%
Mike Michaud 18%
Gary Miller 84%
George Miller 13%
Brad Miller 3%
Walt Minnick 48%
Harry Mitchell 33%
Alan Mollohan 3%
Dennis Moore 5%
Jim Moran, Jr. 5%
Patrick Murphy 3%
Scott Murphy 12%
Sue Myrick 89%
Ben Nelson 33%
Glenn Nye III 48%
Jim Oberstar 8%
Dave Obey 5%
John Olver 8%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 8%
Bill Owens 14%
Ed Pastor 8%
Ron Paul 100%
Donald Payne 18%
Tom Perriello 16%
Tom Petri 75%
Todd Platts 60%
Earl Pomeroy 8%
Mark Pryor 18%
George Radanovich 90%
Nick Rahall II 3%
Denny Rehberg 78%
Silvestre Reyes 3%
Laura Richardson 13%
Jay Rockefeller IV 5%
Ciro Rodriguez 8%
Mike Rogers 73%
Mike Ross 25%
Steve Rothman 3%
John Salazar 8%
Mark Schauer 3%
Jean Schmidt 85%
Aaron Schock 78%
Allyson Schwartz 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top