Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The John Birch Society

2009 Positions (Full Year)

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 5%
Gary Ackerman 0%
John Adler 21%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 5%
Todd Akin 84%
Rodney Alexander 74%
Jason Altmire 25%
Rob Andrews 5%
Michael Arcuri 15%
Steve Austria 60%
Joe Baca, Sr. 5%
Michele Bachmann 90%
Spencer Bachus 75%
Brian Baird 30%
J. Gresham Barrett 88%
John Barrow 30%
Roscoe Bartlett 95%
Max Baucus 10%
Evan Bayh 45%
Melissa Bean 5%
Mark Begich 11%
Bob Bennett 65%
Shelley Berkley 11%
Howard Berman 5%
Marion Berry 16%
Judy Biggert 60%
Brian Bilbray 60%
Jeff Bingaman 5%
Tim Bishop 0%
John Boccieri 15%
Kit Bond 47%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 75%
Mary Bono Mack 53%
Dan Boren 25%
Leonard Boswell 0%
Rick Boucher 11%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 25%
Bruce Braley 5%
Bobby Bright 40%
Paul Broun 95%
Henry Brown, Jr. 95%
Ginny Brown-Waite 65%
Jim Bunning 89%
Roland Burris 0%
Dan Burton 75%
Steve Buyer 84%
Robert Byrd 17%
Dave Camp 75%
John Campbell III 83%
Eric Cantor 85%
Joseph Cao 25%
Dennis Cardoza 10%
Russ Carnahan 0%
Christopher Carney 17%
Mike Castle 40%
Saxby Chambliss 84%
Ben Chandler III 15%
Travis Childers 35%
Howard Coble 80%
Thomas Coburn 100%
Kent Conrad 5%
Jerry Costello 20%
Kathy Dahlkemper 16%
Artur Davis 25%
Geoff Davis 85%
Lincoln Davis 20%
Bill Delahunt 11%
James DeMint 95%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 45%
Norm Dicks 0%
John Dingell 5%
Chris Dodd 5%
Byron Dorgan 11%
David Dreier 75%
Steve Driehaus 15%
Chet Edwards 10%
Vern Ehlers 60%
Brad Ellsworth 20%
Jo Ann Emerson 65%
John Ensign 95%
Bob Etheridge 5%
Russ Feingold 35%
Bob Filner 20%
Barney Frank 5%
Elton Gallegly 85%
Jim Gerlach 45%
Gabrielle Giffords 15%
Phil Gingrey 79%
Charlie Gonzalez 5%
Bart Gordon 10%
Judd Gregg 50%
Parker Griffith, Jr. 40%
Kay Hagan 5%
John Hall 5%
Ralph Hall 70%
Debbie Halvorson 5%
Phil Hare 10%
Tom Harkin 5%
Jane Harman 5%
Doc Hastings 85%
Wally Herger, Jr. 85%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 35%
Baron Hill 30%
Maurice Hinchey 5%
Paul Hodes 10%
Pete Hoekstra 75%
Thomas Holden 15%
Rush Holt, Jr. 5%
Kay Hutchison 68%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 85%
Daniel Inouye 5%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 6%
Mike Johanns 74%
Timothy Johnson 5%
Tim Johnson 85%
Steve Kagen 15%
Paul Kanjorski 10%
Ted Kaufman 5%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 5%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 5%
Mary Jo Kilroy 10%
Jack Kingston 85%
Larry Kissell 21%
Ron Klein 0%
Herb Kohl 5%
Suzanne Kosmas 15%
Frank Kratovil, Jr. 30%
Dennis Kucinich 50%
Jon Kyl 80%
Mary Landrieu 6%
Tom Latham 65%
Steve LaTourette 45%
Frank Lautenberg 5%
Chris Lee 47%
George LeMieux 80%
Carl Levin 5%
Jerry Lewis 85%
Joe Lieberman 5%
Blanche Lincoln 10%
John Linder 94%
Dick Lugar 35%
Dan Lungren 85%
Connie Mack IV 89%
Dan Maffei 11%
Don Manzullo 85%
Betsy Markey 20%
Jim Marshall 45%
Eric Massa 30%
Jim Matheson 50%
Carolyn McCarthy 0%
Thaddeus McCotter 60%
Mike McIntyre 35%
Buck McKeon 80%
Michael McMahon 11%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 10%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 25%
Mike Michaud 20%
Gary Miller 84%
George Miller 11%
Brad Miller 5%
Walt Minnick 35%
Harry Mitchell 35%
Alan Mollohan 5%
Dennis Moore 10%
Jim Moran, Jr. 5%
Patrick Murphy 0%
Scott Murphy 21%
Jack Murtha 5%
Sue Myrick 90%
Ben Nelson 30%
Glenn Nye III 45%
Jim Oberstar 5%
Dave Obey 0%
John Olver 0%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 10%
Ed Pastor 5%
Ron Paul 100%
Donald Payne 15%
Tom Perriello 17%
Tom Petri 70%
Todd Platts 50%
Earl Pomeroy 10%
Mark Pryor 5%
George Radanovich 95%
Nick Rahall II 5%
Denny Rehberg 70%
Silvestre Reyes 5%
Laura Richardson 10%
Jay Rockefeller IV 6%
Ciro Rodriguez 15%
Mike Rogers 65%
Mike Ross 25%
Steve Rothman 5%
John Salazar 16%
Mark Schauer 5%
Jean Schmidt 84%
Allyson Schwartz 0%
José Serrano 20%
Joe Sestak, Jr. 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top