Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The John Birch Society

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 7%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 11%
Todd Akin 90%
Wayne Allard 89%
George Allen 80%
Thomas Allen 5%
Rob Andrews 25%
Richard Armey 65%
Joe Baca, Sr. 26%
Brian Baird 26%
Richard Hugh Baker 65%
Cass Ballenger 60%
James Barcia 45%
Bob Barr, Jr. 75%
Roscoe Bartlett 80%
Charlie Bass 55%
Max Baucus 42%
Evan Bayh 30%
Bob Bennett 95%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 21%
Douglas Bereuter 60%
Shelley Berkley 30%
Howard Berman 5%
Marion Berry 45%
Judy Biggert 50%
Michael Bilirakis 65%
Jeff Bingaman 11%
Rod Blagojevich 15%
Sherwood Boehlert 45%
Kit Bond 85%
Henry Bonilla 63%
David Edward Bonior 10%
Mary Bono Mack 65%
Robert Borski, Jr. 16%
Leonard Boswell 30%
Rick Boucher 26%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 37%
John Breaux 55%
Henry Brown, Jr. 60%
Ed Bryant 70%
Jim Bunning 90%
Conrad Burns 89%
Dan Burton 82%
Steve Buyer 60%
Robert Byrd 10%
Herbert Callahan 60%
Ben Campbell 85%
Chris Cannon 68%
Eric Cantor 75%
Jean Carnahan 40%
Brad Carson 40%
Julia Carson 10%
Mike Castle 45%
Eva Clayton 5%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 45%
Robert Clement 40%
Hillary Clinton 5%
Michael Collins 70%
Larry Combest 70%
Gary Condit 45%
Kent Conrad 15%
John Cooksey 65%
Jon Corzine 5%
Jerry Costello 40%
Christopher Cox 70%
William Coyne 5%
Larry Craig 85%
Robert Cramer 47%
Philip Crane 75%
Randall Cunningham 63%
Thomas Daschle 5%
James Davis 20%
Jo Ann Davis 75%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 5%
Thomas DeLay 68%
James DeMint 75%
Peter Deutsch 15%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 56%
Norm Dicks 20%
Chris Dodd 5%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 84%
Calvin Dooley 30%
John Doolittle 85%
Byron Dorgan 20%
David Dreier 65%
Jennifer Dunn 58%
John Edwards 20%
Chet Edwards 25%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 58%
Jo Ann Emerson 59%
Philip English 55%
John Ensign 80%
Bob Etheridge 30%
Lane Evans 10%
Terry Everett 70%
Russ Feingold 25%
Michael Ferguson 58%
Bob Filner 15%
Peter Fitzgerald 83%
Ernest Fletcher 60%
Mark Foley 63%
Harold Ford, Jr. 20%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 63%
Barney Frank 10%
William Frist 90%
Jonas Frost III 25%
Elton Gallegly 60%
John Ganske 60%
George Gekas 60%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 11%
Jim Gibbons 65%
Wayne Gilchrest 63%
Paul Gillmor 58%
Benjamin Gilman 50%
Charlie Gonzalez 15%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 85%
Bart Gordon 47%
Porter Goss 55%
Daniel Graham 15%
William Phillip Gramm 90%
Mark Green 60%
James Greenwood 50%
Judd Gregg 85%
Felix Grucci, Jr. 55%
Gilbert Gutknecht 70%
Tony Hall 11%
James Hansen 74%
Jane Harman 25%
Melissa Hart 60%
Robert Hayes 60%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 70%
Joel Hefley 85%
Jesse Helms 95%
Wally Herger, Jr. 80%
Baron Hill 30%
Van Hilleary 60%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 10%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
David Lee Hobson 60%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 5%
Pete Hoekstra 80%
Thomas Holden 35%
Ernest Hollings 20%
Darlene Hooley 32%
Stephen Horn 42%
John Nathan Hostettler 95%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 32%
Kenny Hulshof 65%
Duncan Hunter 65%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 85%
Kay Hutchison 80%
Henry Hyde 65%
Daniel Inouye 6%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 83%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 11%
William Jefferson 15%
James Merrill Jeffords 60%
William Lewis Jenkins 60%
Christopher John 45%
Nancy Johnson 45%
Tim Johnson 60%
Paul Kanjorski 20%
Ric Keller 65%
Sue Kelly 45%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 5%
Mark Kennedy 70%
Patrick Kennedy 11%
Brian Kerns 85%
Dale Kildee 20%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 10%
Gerald Kleczka 20%
Joseph Knollenberg 70%
Herb Kohl 26%
James Kolbe 45%
Dennis Kucinich 10%
Jon Kyl 95%
John LaFalce 15%
Ray LaHood 70%
Nicholas Lampson 18%
Tom Lantos 10%
Steve LaTourette 60%
James Leach 40%
Jerry Lewis 72%
Ron Lewis 75%
Joe Lieberman 10%
Blanche Lincoln 40%
John Linder 65%
William Lipinski 42%
Trent Lott, Sr. 80%
Ken Lucas 50%
Dick Lugar 80%
William Luther 15%
James Maloney 35%
Don Manzullo 75%
Frank Mascara 30%
Robert Matsui 10%
Karen McCarthy 15%
James McCrery III 65%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top