or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado Farm Bureau

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 94%
CO U.S. House 7 Ed Perlmutter Democratic 93%
CO State Senate 24 Lois Tochtrop Democratic 82%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 94%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 94%
CO Director of the Public Utilities Commission Douglas Allen Dean 82%
Kay Alexander 100%
Norma Anderson 94%
John Andrews 94%
Ken Arnold 94%
Bob Bacon 71%
Gayle Berry 76%
Nolbert Chavez 56%
Ken Chlouber 94%
Lauri Clapp 88%
Fran Coleman 76%
Richard Decker 80%
F. Jim Dyer 94%
Mary Ellen Epps 94%
John Evans 94%
Rob Fairbank 88%
Daniel Grossman 71%
Lynn Christian Hefley 80%
Robert Michael Hernandez 81%
Mark Hillman 94%
Diane Hoppe 94%
Kenneth Kester 82%
Mark Larson 88%
Joyce Lawrence 75%
Don Lee 76%
Douglas Linkhart 87%
Frana Araujo Mace 71%
Stanley Matsunaka 93%
Carl Miller 94%
Shawn Mitchell 82%
Marilyn Musgrave 94%
Alice Nichol 94%
Joe Nunez 82%
David Owen 94%
Mark Paschall 76%
Pat Pascoe 81%
Terry Phillips 88%
Tom Plant 47%
Ann Ragsdale 59%
Peggy Reeves 88%
Todd Saliman 47%
Glenn Scott 82%
William Sinclair 88%
Matt Smith 88%
Nancy Spence 88%
Lola Spradley 94%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 76%
William Swenson 88%
Abel Tapia 88%
Ronald Teck 94%
Bill Thiebaut, Jr. 81%
Jennifer Veiga 71%
Valentin Vigil 71%
William Webster 94%
Suzanne Williams 76%
Tambor Williams 88%
John Witwer 82%
Bradley Young 94%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top