Rating Group: California Labor Federation

2011 Floor Score

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-1 Doug LaMalfa R 0%
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 97%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 3%
CA U.S. House-11 Mark DeSaulnier D 100%
CA U.S. House-21 David Valadao R 3%
CA U.S. House-25 Steve Knight R 3%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 93%
CA U.S. House-33 Ted Lieu D 93%
CA U.S. House-35 Norma Torres D 83%
CA U.S. House-45 Mimi Walters R 0%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 93%
CA U.S. House-51 Juan Vargas D 96%
CA State Assembly-6 Beth Gaines R 4%
CA State Assembly-12 Kristin Olsen R 4%
CA State Assembly-14 Susan Bonilla D 96%
CA State Assembly-24 Richard Gordon D 66%
CA State Assembly-27 Nora Campos D 97%
CA State Assembly-30 Luis Alejo D 93%
CA State Assembly-31 Henry Perea D 76%
CA State Assembly-34 Shannon Grove R 3%
CA State Assembly-35 Katcho Achadjian R 0%
CA State Assembly-37 Das Williams D 100%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 90%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 100%
CA State Assembly-68 Don Wagner R 3%
CA State Assembly-71 Brian Jones R 7%
CA State Assembly-78 Toni Atkins D 93%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 4%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 78%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 4%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 69%
CA State Senate-6 Richard Pan D 97%
CA State Senate-8 Tom Berryhill R 4%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-10 Bob Wieckowski D 93%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-12 Anthony Cannella R 0%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 93%
CA State Senate-15 Jim Beall, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-16 Jean Fuller R 0%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 93%
CA State Senate-21 Sharon Runner R 4%
CA State Senate-22 Ed Hernandez D 85%
CA State Senate-23 Mike Morrell R 3%
CA State Senate-24 Kevin de Leon D 96%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 81%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 96%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 4%
CA State Senate-30 Holly Mitchell D 90%
CA State Senate-32 Tony Mendoza D 100%
CA State Senate-33 Ricardo Lara D 100%
CA State Senate-35 Isadore Hall III D 96%
CA State Senate-38 Joel Anderson R 0%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 100%
CA State Senate-40 Ben Hueso D 97%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla D 96%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries 4%
CA Supervisor-4 Curt Hagman 3%
CA Supervisor-5 Joe Simitian N/A 88%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo 89%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield 100%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes 93%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. 89%
CA State Board of Equalization Diane Harkey R 3%
CA State Board of Equalization Fiona Ma D 96%
Michael Allen 97%
Elaine Alquist 96%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Bill Berryhill 3%
Sam Blakeslee 7%
Steven Bradford 97%
Joan Buchanan 72%
Betsy Butler 97%
Charles Calderon 90%
Ron Calderon 67%
Amina Carter 89%
Wesley Chesbro 93%
Connie Conway 3%
Ellen Corbett 100%
Lou Correa 52%
Mike Davis 88%
Roger Dickinson 97%
Tim Donnelly 3%
Robert Dutton 4%
Bill Emmerson 4%
Mike Eng 100%
Noreen Evans 96%
Mike Feuer 93%
Nathan Fletcher 14%
Paul Fong 100%
Warren Furutani 93%
Martin Garrick 4%
Linda Halderman 7%
Tom Harman 0%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Alyson Huber 55%
Christine Kehoe 96%
Dan Logue 3%
Bonnie Lowenthal 97%
Allan Mansoor 3%
Jeff Miller 7%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 96%
Brian Nestande 14%
Chris Norby 3%
John Pérez 97%
Manuel Pérez 89%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 93%
Michael Rubio 78%
Jim Silva 3%
Nancy Skinner 100%
Cameron Smyth 7%
Jose Solorio 93%
Darrell Steinberg 96%
Tony Strickland 0%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Roderick Wright 63%
Mark Wyland 4%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 85%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.