Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Planned Parenthood Action Fund

1995-1998 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Jack Quinn 0%
George Radanovich 10%
Nick Rahall II 0%
James Ramstad 70%
Ralph Regula 20%
Silvestre Reyes 78%
Bob Riley 0%
Lynn Nancy Rivers 100%
Charles Robb 100%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 100%
Timothy Roemer 30%
James Rogan 11%
William Roth, Jr. 40%
Steve Rothman 100%
Marge Roukema 70%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 67%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 10%
Joe Scarborough 0%
Robert Schaffer 0%
José Serrano 100%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 50%
Christopher Shays 90%
E.G. Shuster 10%
Norman Sisisky 90%
Joseph Skeen 10%
Ike Skelton 0%
Gordon Smith 0%
Nick Smith 0%
Bob Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 100%
Vic Snyder 78%
Mark Souder 0%
Arlen Specter 60%
Floyd Spence 10%
John Spratt, Jr. 70%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 10%
Charles Stenholm 0%
Ted Stevens 20%
Ted Strickland 78%
Bob Stump 0%
Bart Stupak 10%
John Sununu 11%
James Talent 0%
John Tanner 60%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
William Tauzin 0%
Charles Taylor 0%
Gene Taylor 0%
Craig Thomas 0%
William Thomas 60%
Fred Thompson 0%
Karen Thurman 89%
Strom Thurmond 0%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
John Tierney 100%
Robert Torricelli 100%
Ed Towns 100%
James Traficant, Jr. 20%
James Turner 56%
Bruce Vento 90%
James Walsh 10%
Zach Wamp 0%
John Warner 0%
Wesley Watkins 0%
Mel Watt 100%
Julius Caesar Watts, Jr. 0%
Henry Waxman 100%
David Weldon 0%
W. Curtis Weldon 10%
Gerald Weller 0%
Paul Wellstone 100%
Robert Wexler 100%
Bob Weygand 33%
Heather Wilson 25%
Bob Wise, Jr. 100%
Frank Wolf 0%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
Albert Wynn 100%
Bill Young 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top