Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Planned Parenthood Action Fund

2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
AL U.S. House 4 Robert Aderholt Republican 0%
Spencer Bachus 0%
CA U.S. House 34 Xavier Becerra Democratic 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 20%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 0%
AR U.S. Senate Sr John Boozman Republican 0%
CA U.S. House 24 Lois Capps Democratic 100%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Robert Cramer 55%
Artur Davis 67%
Calvin Dooley 100%
John Doolittle 0%
David Dreier 0%
CA U.S. House 18 Anna Eshoo Democratic 100%
Terry Everett 0%
CA U.S. House 20 Sam Farr Democratic 100%
AZ U.S. Senate Jr Jeff Flake Republican 0%
AZ U.S. House 8 Trent Franks Republican 0%
Elton Gallegly 9%
AZ U.S. House 3 Raúl Grijalva Democratic 100%
Jane Harman 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
CA U.S. House 17 Mike Honda Democratic 100%
James Kolbe 82%
Tom Lantos 100%
CA U.S. House 13 Barbara Lee Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 19 Zoe Lofgren Democratic 100%
Robert Matsui 100%
Buck McKeon 0%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
George Miller 100%
CA U.S. House 22 Devin Nunes Republican 0%
Doug Ose 75%
Ed Pastor 100%
CA U.S. House 12 Nancy Pelosi Democratic 100%
Richard Pombo 0%
George Radanovich 0%
Richard Renzi 0%
AL U.S. House 3 Mike Rogers Republican 0%
Mike Ross 33%
CA U.S. House 40 Lucille Roybal-Allard Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 28 Adam Schiff Democratic 100%
John Shadegg 0%
CA U.S. House 30 Brad Sherman Democratic 100%
Vic Snyder 80%
Hilda Solis 100%
Pete Stark 100%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
William Thomas 55%
CA U.S. House 5 Mike Thompson Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 43 Maxine Waters Democratic 100%
Diane Watson 100%
Henry Waxman 100%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
AK U.S. House At-Large Don Young Republican 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top