State Office Name Party Rating
AK U.S. House-At-Large Don Young R 0%
AL U.S. House-3 Mike Rogers R 0%
AL U.S. House-4 Robert Aderholt R 0%
AL U.S. House-6 Spencer Bachus R 0%
AR U.S. Senate-Jr John Boozman R 0%
AZ U.S. Senate-Jr Jeff Flake R 0%
AZ U.S. House-3 Raúl Grijalva D 100%
AZ U.S. House-7 Ed Pastor D 100%
AZ U.S. House-8 Trent Franks R 0%
CA U.S. House-5 Mike Thompson D 100%
CA U.S. House-11 George Miller D 100%
CA U.S. House-12 Nancy Pelosi D 100%
CA U.S. House-13 Barbara Lee D 100%
CA U.S. House-17 Mike Honda D 100%
CA U.S. House-18 Anna Eshoo D 100%
CA U.S. House-19 Zoe Lofgren D 100%
CA U.S. House-20 Sam Farr D 100%
CA U.S. House-22 Devin Nunes R 0%
CA U.S. House-24 Lois Capps D 100%
CA U.S. House-25 Buck McKeon R 0%
CA U.S. House-28 Adam Schiff D 100%
CA U.S. House-30 Brad Sherman D 100%
CA U.S. House-33 Henry Waxman D 100%
CA U.S. House-34 Xavier Becerra D 100%
CA U.S. House-40 Lucille Roybal-Allard D 100%
CA U.S. House-43 Maxine Waters D 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 20%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 0%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Robert Cramer 55%
Artur Davis 67%
Calvin Dooley 100%
John Doolittle 0%
David Dreier 0%
Terry Everett 0%
Elton Gallegly 9%
Jane Harman 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
James Kolbe 82%
Tom Lantos 100%
Robert Matsui 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Doug Ose 75%
Richard Pombo 0%
George Radanovich 0%
Richard Renzi 0%
Mike Ross 33%
John Shadegg 0%
Vic Snyder 80%
Hilda Solis 100%
Pete Stark 100%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
William Thomas 55%
Diane Watson 100%
Lynn Woolsey 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.